Gustavo,
You are probably over-thinking this. If the first job runs every time the
services are re-started and you are not getting any messages via email -
that's the problem.
Mehma
---
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Gustavo Nunes Freire Ribeiro
wrote:
> The problem is certainly in version 3.0.3. In version 3.0.2 this problem
> does not happen.
>
> John, I'm sure the problem is not in the database. The job that I
> perform, the bacula-dir shows me running, but not running on th
The problem is certainly in version 3.0.3. In version 3.0.2 this problem
does not happen.
John, I'm sure the problem is not in the database. The job that I
perform, the bacula-dir shows me running, but not running on the
bacula-sd and not in the bacula-fd too.
John Drescher escreveu:
> On Sat, Ap
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Gustavo Nunes Freire Ribeiro
wrote:
> Hello Mehma,
>
> I've done these 2 tests:
>
> I commented out messages section and still going the same problem. Guilt
> bstmp's really not because I am not using it.
>
> I had restarted the bacula-dir after running the first
Hello Mehma,
I've done these 2 tests:
I commented out messages section and still going the same problem. Guilt
bstmp's really not because I am not using it.
I had restarted the bacula-dir after running the first job and it runs
the first job, when I run the second job it
simply stop. When I ask
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Gustavo Nunes Freire Ribeiro <
gust...@linconet.com.br> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm facing a problem with bacula 3.0.3. It simply stops
> work when I run the second job after starting bacula-dir. I saw emails
> here on the list talking about this issue, and pu
Hello everybody,
I'm facing a problem with bacula 3.0.3. It simply stops
work when I run the second job after starting bacula-dir. I saw emails
here on the list talking about this issue, and put the blame on bsmtp. I
ran
at bacula and the foreground with debug = 100. I noticed that when
starting a
