[Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-15 Thread Mike
I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not go into the details) needs to have all files from that workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked such that the bacula-fd.conf can contain a passphrase

[Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-15 Thread Mike
I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not go into the details) needs to have all files from that workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked such that the bacula-fd.conf can contain a passphrase

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-15 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not go into the details) needs to have all files from that workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked such that

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-14 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 But the release WAS 1.36 -- there was no 1.37. So... has the process changed here, or is the original post incorrect? _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III |$| |__| | | |__/ | \| _|

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 14 August 2006 17:16, Ryan Novosielski wrote: But the release WAS 1.36 -- there was no 1.37. So... has the process changed here, or is the original post incorrect? Bacula versions n.even.xx (e.g. 1.36.1 or 1.38.11) are production releases. Versions n.odd.xx (e.g. 1.37.5 or 1.39.18)

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-12 Thread John Drescher
Wonderful. Any estimate on the release of 1.39? Mike The source has already been released. Since this is a odd number I believe all 1.39 releases will be beta only and you will have to wait for 1.40 for an official release. John

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-12 Thread Dan Langille
On 12 Aug 2006 at 4:19, John Drescher wrote: Wonderful. Any estimate on the release of 1.39? When it's ready. Weeks or months, not days. The source has already been released. Since this is a odd number I believe all 1.39 releases will be beta only and you will have to wait for 1.40 for

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-12 Thread John Drescher
This is not the case. We don't release like that. What we have recently released is 1.39-beta. Eventually, there will be a full 1.39 release. -- Sorry, It's been a long enough time with 1.38 that I forgot of the previous release was 1.37 or 1.36. John

[Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-11 Thread Mike
I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not go into the details) needs to have all files from that workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked such that the bacula-fd.conf can contain a passphrase

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-11 Thread Landon Fuller
On Aug 11, 2006, at 13:24, Mike wrote: I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not go into the details) needs to have all files from that workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked such that

Re: [Bacula-users] encrypting files?

2006-08-11 Thread Mike
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Landon Fuller might have said: This functionality is available in the 1.39 betas; I have some documentation on my web site: http://landonf.bikemonkey.org/code/bacula/ Configuring_Bacula_Encryption.20060305184424.26351.sandbox.html The encryption is implemented