[Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-19 Thread Christopher
Hello all, I am running fedora core 5 and after creating the recovery cd, when I go to test it on another computer ( I do not want to test it on the actual server that I have backed up till I know it works) I am unable to actually logon. After selecting the first option, which is meant to allow y

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 06:47, Christopher wrote: > Hello all, > > I am running fedora core 5 and after creating the recovery cd, when I go > to test it on another computer ( I do not want to test it on the actual > server that I have backed up till I know it works) I am unable to actually > logon.

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-24 Thread Christopher
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 06:47, Christopher wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I am running fedora core 5 and after creating the recovery cd, when I go >> to test it on another computer ( I do not want to test it on the actual >> server that I have backed up till I know it works) I am unable to >> actu

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-26 Thread Christopher
I am posting this again, as I have not received a reply, and the archive on source forge does not appear to have been updated in about 5 days. I really need to get this issue resolved. I am using bash as the root login shell. /bin/sh is shown as below from the shell: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# whi

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 26 June 2006 10:16, Christopher wrote: > I am posting this again, as I have not received a reply, and the archive > on source forge does not appear to have been updated in about 5 days. I > really need to get this issue resolved. I did send you a reply. If that is not the problem, then

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-26 Thread Christopher
Thanks for the reply, Is it the Makefile for the rescue cd that has the option for running under qemu? I must be doing something wrong, as I installed qemu rpm, and get: Could not initialize SDL - exiting Any tips would be great. I am not using an smp kernel, so I am just wondering if this may

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 26 June 2006 12:39, Christopher wrote: > Thanks for the reply, > > Is it the Makefile for the rescue cd that has the option for running under > qemu? Yes, cd /linux/cdrom make boot I generally run qemu as non-root out of fear something could go wrong. Take note of what it puts in

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-06-28 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Maybe this is just a typo or bad manual copy and paste, but /bin/sh is a link to /bin/bash, but you cite rootSbin.list. Is bash in /bin or /sbin? IIRC, it is normally in /bin so normal users have access. HTH, Jeff Quoting Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am posting this again, as I have no

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-07-05 Thread Christopher
Hello everyone, I tried qemu with fedora core 5 (with all the updates/security fixes to the core build) and even qemu did not want to run on core 5. It said that there are known issues with glibc 4.x (which just happens to be what is installed on a core 5 updated). I also tried the 1.8.2 version

Re: [Bacula-users] loging in using recovery cd fails rescue-cd 1.8.3

2006-07-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 06 July 2006 08:06, Christopher wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I tried qemu with fedora core 5 (with all the updates/security fixes to > the core build) and even qemu did not want to run on core 5. It said that > there are known issues with glibc 4.x (which just happens to be what is > i