Re: [Bacula-users] maximum concurrent jobs for a job

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, again, On 11/9/2006 3:57 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: > On Wednesday 11 October 2006 21:44, Arno Lehmann wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>On 10/11/2006 1:31 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: ... >>Yes. Either use different pools (which you might do anyway beause of the >>different retention times) and assign a stor

Re: [Bacula-users] maximum concurrent jobs for a job

2006-11-09 Thread Silver Salonen
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 21:44, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/11/2006 1:31 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I'm testing Bacula 1.38.9 on Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm a little confused here. > > > > What I would like to achieve is to be able to run a job concurrently with the > > sa

Re: [Bacula-users] maximum concurrent jobs for a job

2006-10-11 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 10/11/2006 1:31 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: > Hi. > > I'm testing Bacula 1.38.9 on Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm a little confused here. > > What I would like to achieve is to be able to run a job concurrently with the > same job's different levels. Tricky, IMO. Mostly because I don't know if it

[Bacula-users] maximum concurrent jobs for a job

2006-10-11 Thread Silver Salonen
Hi. I'm testing Bacula 1.38.9 on Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm a little confused here. What I would like to achieve is to be able to run a job concurrently with the same job's different levels. For example, when there's a full backup running for a week, it'd be possible to run incrementals or different