On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Ralf Gross wrote:
FYI: the HP Ultrium 1840 LTO-4 drives have a buffer size of 128MB.
Are these FC or LVD interface?
AB
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log
Alan Brown schrieb:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Ralf Gross wrote:
FYI: the HP Ultrium 1840 LTO-4 drives have a buffer size of 128MB.
Are these FC or LVD interface?
We have two drives with LVD interface.
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/ultrium1840/specs.html
Ralf
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Ralf Gross wrote:
Are these FC or LVD interface?
We have two drives with LVD interface.
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/ultrium1840/specs.html
Ah, standalone drives.
I was doubtful that the FC-LVD routers in MSL-series changers could keep
up with LTO4
Alan Brown schrieb:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Ralf Gross wrote:
Are these FC or LVD interface?
We have two drives with LVD interface.
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/ultrium1840/specs.html
Ah, standalone drives.
Well, the two drive are in a Overland Neo 4100 changer.
Alan Brown schrieb:
Also, as I said, I remain very skeptical about sizes greater than 500K, and
there is even a certain amount of evidence from my own tests and from
several
other users that increasing the size above 128K makes no significant
difference.
FWIW the tape drives I'm
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
And I did as I said I will increase this limit,.
OK, I missed that bit/
Also, as I said, I remain very skeptical about sizes greater than 500K, and
there is even a certain amount of evidence from my own tests and from several
other users that
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:18, Alan Brown wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
And I did as I said I will increase this limit,.
OK, I missed that bit/
Also, as I said, I remain very skeptical about sizes greater than 500K,
and there is even a certain amount of evidence from
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Version 2.2.5 is a major bug fix release to version 2.2.4
- It fixes the following bugs: #961, 962, 963, 969, 968, 960,
964, (possibly 935 and 903), 953, 953, 967, 966, 965, 954,
957, 908, 958, and 955.
Looking at this, it appears you simply closed
On Friday 12 October 2007 12:15, Alan Brown wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Version 2.2.5 is a major bug fix release to version 2.2.4
- It fixes the following bugs: #961, 962, 963, 969, 968, 960,
964, (possibly 935 and 903), 953, 953, 967, 966, 965, 954,
957, 908, 958,
