Re: Unity of nations

2009-02-09 Thread shahram rohani
The Baha'i Studies Listserv dear Sen, HI the other Persian word for century is sadeh. Yours/Rohani --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Sen Sonja sen.so...@casema.nl wrote: From: Sen Sonja sen.so...@casema.nl Subject: Re: Unity of nations To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Date: Sunday, February 8

Re: Unity of nations

2009-02-09 Thread Don Calkins
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Feb 4, 2009, at 12:25 AM, David Friedman wrote: I'm interested as to how those who believe this prophecy has already been fulfilled interpret All men will adhere to one religion, will have one common faith. Shoghi Effendi said that would happen in the

Re: Unity of nations

2009-02-09 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv this is an excellent point: :Spiritual Assemblies WERE established in the century in which `Abdu'l-Baha wrote the words, right? Also, why couldn't the teachings of Baha'u'llah be the spirit of the 20th century (and beyond, i think so for 2 reasons: 1. :-) going wayyy

Re: Unity of nations

2009-02-09 Thread Iskandar Hai, M.D.
: From: Sen Sonja sen.so...@casema.nl Subject: Re: Unity of nations To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 10:52 AM The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 8 Feb 2009 at 8:54, Benjamin La Framboise wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv Sorry...I had question I forgot to ask

RE: Unity of nations

2009-02-08 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 6 Feb 2009 at 11:24, David Friedman wrote: Have you written the House (or should I say the Research Department) to get their feedback on your view of this prophecy? I would be interested to see what they'd say. Since you haven't said anything I'm guessing you

Re: Unity of nations

2009-02-08 Thread Benjamin La Framboise
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Hey, Sen... I'm not sure why you would rule out the 100 years within which I speak interpretation of both quotes you offered. Spiritual Assemblies WERE established in the century in which `Abdu'l-Baha wrote the words, right? Also, why couldn't the teachings of

Re: Unity of nations

2009-02-08 Thread Benjamin La Framboise
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Sorry...I had question I forgot to ask: What is the term/phrase/etc. in Arabic or Persian that means 100-year span of time? Does one exist? Did Baha'u'llah or Abdu'l-Baha use this term/phrase, ever? Ben On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Sen Sonja sen.so...@casema.nl

Re: Unity of nations

2009-02-08 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 8 Feb 2009 at 8:54, Benjamin La Framboise wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv Sorry...I had question I forgot to ask: What is the term/phrase/etc. in Arabic or Persian that means 100-year span of time? Does one exist? Did Baha'u'llah or Abdu'l-Baha use this

RE: Unity of nations

2009-02-06 Thread David Friedman
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Hi Sen, Anyone who is willing to take the time to study the examples can see that Abdu'l-Baha uses qarn and `asr, often as a pair together, to refer to an age, era, dispensation etc; and that Shoghi Effendi regularly translates this as age, era,

RE: Unity of nations

2009-02-03 Thread David Friedman
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Religious and sectarian antagonism, the hostility of races and peoples, and differences among nations, will be eliminated. All men will adhere to one religion, will have one common faith, will be blended into one race, and become a single people. All will dwell in

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-29 Thread Gary Selchert
The Baha'i Studies Listserv The question still remains, how should Baha'is understand Shoghi Effendi's statement that: One of the great events, 'Abdu'l-Bahá has, in His Some Answered Questions, affirmed, which is to occur in the Day of the manifestation of that Incomparable Branch

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-29 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 29 Jan 2009 at 16:58, Gary Selchert wrote: 4) The unbelieving option will not be put to rest by any of these. Nothing in any of the three believing options can decisively refute, to the satisfaction of everyone who asks, the contention that Shoghi Effendi was

RE: Unity of nations

2009-01-29 Thread Gary Selchert
The Baha'i Studies Listserv David has asked: What would have to happen historically for the Baha'i Faith to be proven wrong? What has to happen historically for the Baha'i Faith to be proven wrong is the same as what would have to happen historically for any other faith to be proven wrong.

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-29 Thread Mark A. Foster
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Gary Selchert wrote: This certainly seems to be implicit in the non-binding narrative carried forward by One Common Faith, prepared under the supervision of, and commended to our attention and study by, but lacking any assertion of infallibility by, the Universal

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-27 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv actually, inerrancy would prevent house from being conflated with principles unless it was a house of cards..in which case it would be burned by a Whisper of the Voice... ezekiel 14:7...et seq. so far as the people type tendency to do such thinga...i see it all the

RE: Unity of nations

2009-01-27 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv david, according to accepted practice, one would ask for defintions of nations, peace and established. the one would hammer out the definitional issues, using either Baha'u'llah or self as the anvil. occasinally one would ask what kind of crack other other was

RE: Unity of nations

2009-01-27 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv sen, ;It is not the familiarity of the governments of the nations that we must seek, but familiarity below the grassroots yeah...in the dust. i recall once making this point (without an answer back) with a professor from michigan or wherever about the meaning of

RE: Unity of nations

2009-01-26 Thread Sen Sonja
explain to a non-Baha'i that we already have world unity, that the nations are already united? We don't. We - the world - don't have world unity or unity of nations, and we (the Bahais) don't try to claim that we do when we obviously don't. How would one also argue that the unity of nations

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-26 Thread Dean Betts
: ..this wondrous revelation [duur], this glorious century [qarn] (The Promised Day is Come, p. 119) ..ere the close of this century [qarn] and of this age [`asr] (The World Order of Baha'u'llah, p. 205) How would one explain to a non-Baha'i that we already have world unity, that the nations

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-26 Thread Ursus Maximus
The Baha'i Studies Listserv David, There is no way to explain this. To a believer in literal inerrancy, nothing can change their mind, they will always rationalize any amount of contrary evidence. Thus, you can not have a rational discussion with a Christian or Islamic fundamentalist. God

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-26 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv It is apparent to any person that peace is not established. I'd like to point out that the Universal House of Justice has never suggested that peace has been established. They seem to be interpreting 'unity of nations' as the development of a global identity

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-26 Thread Dean Betts
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Nor, for that matter, was `Abdu'l-Baha. - Original Message - From: Dean Betts fdbe...@mindspring.com To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 9:37 AM Subject: Re: Unity of nations The Baha'i Studies Listserv Perhaps all

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-26 Thread Mark A. Foster
The Baha'i Studies Listserv David Friedman wrote: How would one explain to a non-Baha'i that we already have world unity, that the nations are already united? No non-Baha'i would agree. The only reason Baha'is believe it is by having a 'watered down' definition of world peace, one that doesn't

RE: Unity of nations

2009-01-25 Thread David Friedman
The Baha'i Studies Listserv This is the stage which the world is now approaching, the stage of world unity, which, as Abdu'l-Baha assures us, will, in this century, be securely established. (PDC) How would one explain to a non-Baha'i that we already have world unity, that the nations

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-15 Thread Sen Sonja
it is The fifth candle is the unity of nations [wahdat-e watan] --a unity which in this century [qarn] will be securely established, causing all the peoples of the world to regard themselves as citizens of one common fatherland. but in his earlier translation, published

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-15 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv sen ;although translation is not the sphere of the Guardian's infallibility i would offer that only the Guardian is ther determiner of the Guardian's situational conferredness (to neologise) of infalliblity. i tend, being the smple beast of the fields tht i am to

Unity of Nations - qarn and `asr

2009-01-14 Thread Sen Sonja
of unity tablet.) the unity of nations, a unity which in this century [qarn] will be securely established (ditto) ere the close of this century [qarn] and of this age [`asr] (WOB 205) in every dispensation [qarn], the light of divine guidance (WOB 36) when Christ appeared, twenty centuries [qarn] ago

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-14 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv sen, :but the translators are following Shoghi Effendi's practice, when translating similar phrases in Baha'u'llah's writings: that suggests to me that the translators are accepting the infallibility of the Guardian--not that of potential readers. i find that a

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-13 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 12 Jan 2009 at 17:26, Don Calkins wrote: And you really believe that tho' Shoghi Effendi translated the phrase as this century, what Abdu'l-Baha really meant was this age/era? I not only think it, I can document it. I'm going to do that in my next blog, God

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-13 Thread Benjamin La Framboise
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Dear Sen... You said: I've been asked a couple of times which language I think young Bahai scholars should learn first, Persian or Arabic? When asked in France, I replied, French; when asked in England I replied, English. By that I mean that a study of the

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-13 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv benjamin, an actual study of english, like get real and get over study wouldidictae that century means 10 x 10 ...since cricket and snooker players use the term. they might look at an explanation from the Master for another number...to get a range for

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-13 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv i am being randomly amused by arguments against sen's point of view that depend on fallibility by the House or the beloved Guardian--in order to preserve the view that some individual (other than sen) is right. the relevant cite appears to be (and if i missed

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-13 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 13 Jan 2009 at 10:44, Benjamin La Framboise wrote: The teachings of Baha'u'llah are the light of this age and the spirit of this century. (Selections from the writings of 'Abdu'l-Baha, page 107) Just curious, why wouldn't this have been translated

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-12 Thread Sen Sonja
that as 'century', and his hearers jumping to the conclusion that he means the 20th gregorian century. I do not think Abdu'l-Baha anywhere explicitly connects either the Lesser Peace or the Unity of Nations, or anything analogous, to our western 20th century. In one of His Tablets 'Abdu'l-Baha

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-12 Thread Don Calkins
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Jan 12, 2009, at 4:11 AM, Sen Sonja wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv What's your point Don? Sen You said that all the texts that refer to the unity of nations being established in this century all came from pilgrim's notes. In fact the selection I

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-12 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 12 Jan 2009 at 7:21, Don Calkins wrote: You said that all the texts that refer to the unity of nations being established in this century all came from pilgrim's notes. No, I said: ..I think that Taherzadeh and others are mistaken in saying that Abdu'l-Baha

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-12 Thread Don Calkins
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Sen Sonja wrote: On 12 Jan 2009 at 7:21, Don Calkins wrote: You said that all the texts that refer to the unity of nations being established in this century all came from pilgrim's notes. No, I said: ..I think that Taherzadeh

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-12 Thread Sen Sonja
that Abdu'l-Baha promised both orally and in writing, that the unity of nations will be established during the twentieth century and the UHJ saying that ‘Abdu’l-Bahá made statements linking the establishment of the unity of nations to the twentieth century and citing the '7 candles' tablet as its

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-12 Thread Don Calkins
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Jan 12, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Sen Sonja wrote: No Don, the text is an authentic tablet. If you read the 7 candles tablet carefully, you will see that it does not refer to the 20th century. It refers to this century. And you really believe that tho' Shoghi Effendi

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-11 Thread Don Calkins
to the conclusion that he means the 20th gregorian century. I do not think Abdu'l-Baha anywhere explicitly connects either the Lesser Peace or the Unity of Nations, or anything analogous, to our western 20th century. In one of His Tablets 'Abdu'l-Baha, elucidating further His noble theme

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-05 Thread Gary Selchert
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Hello all… Hi Sen, Most specifically I was referring to Shoghi Effendi’s comment in *** The Promised Day Is Come *** (Wilmette,1980 printing) p. 121: ‘One of the great events, 'Abdu'l-Bahá has, in His Some Answered Questions, affirmed, which is to occur in the Day

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-05 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 5 Jan 2009 at 9:46, Gary Selchert wrote: ‘One of the great events, 'Abdu'l-Bahá has, in His Some Answered Questions, affirmed, which is to occur in the Day of the manifestation of that Incomparable Branch [Bahá'u'lláh] is the hoisting of the Standard of God

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-05 Thread Benjamin La Framboise
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Dear Sen, I understand that, below, Shoghi Effendi is reminding us about what `Abdu'l-Baha has said. He's not just quoting `Abdu'l-Baha, however; he is using the term 'century' himself. If it was only `Abdu'l-Baha using this term, and we had His definition to guide

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-05 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 5 Jan 2009 at 17:05, Benjamin La Framboise wrote: I understand that, below, Shoghi Effendi is reminding us about what `Abdu'l-Baha has said. He's not just quoting `Abdu'l-Baha, however; he is using the term 'century' himself. If it was only `Abdu'l-Baha using

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-05 Thread Gary Selchert
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Sorry. I may be a bear of very little brain, but the notion that Shoghi Effendi would write a long epistle in English, use the English word century twenty-five times, twenty-one of which refer to a conventional hundred-year span, and then without warning or comment,

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-04 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 3 Jan 2009 at 14:52, Don Calkins wrote: The reasons the UHJ gave are here: http://bahairants.com/fahrenheit-145-77.html As I remember, those were not the reasons the House of Justice gave. Where is the text of the actual letter you rcvd concerning your

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-04 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv sen :-) first, portion requires that i note how randomlu amused i am by the amount of common ground we see, and the difference in our angle of view in doing it..:-) : that the consensus of the faithful is a source of Bahai teachings. In this the Bahai Faith

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-04 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv don, my limited ability to be swimming within TG suggests to me that the name sen isn't in the Tablet of theBranch or whatever It is, or the WT, and therefore, yes: sen's understadning of the Faith is seriously flawed. as near as i can tell, that would be the

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-03 Thread shahram rohani
The Baha'i Studies Listserv DEAR MR.FRIEDMAN, YOU R RIGHT TT THE 2 TARGETS WILL HAPPEN AT THE SAME TIME.PLS ALSO NOTE THAT THOSE PRINCIPALS WERE NOT MENTIONED BY BAHAULLAH FR THE FIRST TIME. IN THE IRANIAN RELIGIOUS CULTURE IT WAS VERY COMMON TO BELIEVE IN UNITY OF NATIONS AND WORLD PEACE UNDER

re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-03 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv sen, :establishment does not equal manfestation. :mankind will see the establishment of the Lesser Peace who is mankind in this sentence? i dimly recall a statement that the various heap of praise laid upon the letters of the Living by the Bab were all about

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-03 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv ron, i offer again, the infallibility of the Voice, the complete errancy of the human (not animal) ear. the word generation is used with 2 closely related meaning in the Bible. one might be reduced to profit motive the other to the ring around the rosy of how

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-03 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 2 Jan 2009 at 23:04, Gary Selchert wrote: Throughout the twentieth century, many prominent Baha’is were enkindled by the certainty that first the calamity, then the Lesser Peace, and the resulting unity of nations would be a very visible, tangible, world

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-03 Thread Don Calkins
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Jan 3, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Sen Sonja wrote: This is the scuttlebut on discussion lists, but there's no truth in it. The reasons the UHJ gave are here: http://bahairants.com/fahrenheit-145-77.html As I remember, those were not the reasons the House of Justice

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Paul McKibben
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I would like to present some thoughts I have on this thread. First the thread is title Unity of nations but seem to be more concern with infallibility.The two are not as directly link as some people believe. That the Universal House of Justice and the writings

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Mark A. Foster
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Gilberto Simpson wrote: Sorry for nit-picking but isn't the second category non-plenary inerrancy? In other others, the verbal part is a little bit redundant since we are talking about a scripture which consists of words. The distinction is whether you want to say

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv uless u conflate the words when and by which time as being the same, i donlt see that reading. and accuracy of language requires me not to conflate them. when spring comes the daffodils will bloom does no equal january yet one does not equal the other without

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv mark, lololol.. :verbal plenary inerrancy from the Prophets, i do expect such as part of the Mosty Great Unity...which leaves me realising that humans need to run quite a bit faster than they wish to. it might be of some utility to note that rther reently i was

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv i would offer that the beloved and infallible Guardian somwehere or other (i am all about precise cites) suggested invoking hypotheticals when there was an actual world to play in was not totally what he wished for. :Universal House of Justice don't have plenary

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Mark A. Foster
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Paul McKibben wrote: With the Universal House of Justice, it is the (I am tempted to put thenext word in caps)decisions that is infallible and that means in respectto the interests of the Baha'i Faith has a whole it will guide it on the best course in these uncertain

re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Gary Selchert
prominent Baha’is were enkindled by the certainty that first the calamity, then the Lesser Peace, and the resulting unity of nations would be a very visible, tangible, world-dominating reality prior to 1 January 2001. They had good reason to hold these views. It is not easy to interpret World

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Ursus Maximus
of the meaning of infallibility. Throughout the twentieth century, many prominent Baha'is were enkindled by the certainty that first the calamity, then the Lesser Peace, and the resulting unity of nations would be a very visible, tangible, world-dominating reality prior to 1 January 2001

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Ursus Maximus
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Dear Susan, On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Susan Maneck sman...@gmail.com wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv My problem is, it seems to me that most Baha'is including famous ones who speak at Conferences and etc. probably do not find my understanding

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Yes we have but I am still troubled. Dear Ron, Then maybe it is your own tolerance level you need to work on. That is reassuring to me but I also see and hear conflicting attitudes. So let's make room for conflicting attitutdes. I wish I knew why Sen was

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Ursus Maximus
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Mark, thanks, your feedback is mot helpful. I think I will start using your term plenary inerrancy to refer to what I don't believe in as valid definition of infallibility. I need a shorthand for a complex concept. In the interest of brevity, I will not quote the bulk o

Re: Unity of Nations

2009-01-02 Thread Ursus Maximus
the letter from the research department on the Lesser Peace and found something interesting. They say that the unity of nations should not be regarded as being synonymous with the Lesser Peace, yet from a House letter from the 80's it appears that they used to be of the understanding

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-02 Thread Mark A. Foster
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Hi, Ron: I think I will start using your term plenary inerrancy to refer to what I don't believe in as valid definition of infallibility. I need a shorthand for a complex concept. Personally, unless I am addressing Protestant evangelicals, or discussing

Unity of nations

2009-01-01 Thread David Friedman
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I was looking through the letter from the research department on the Lesser Peace and found something interesting. They say that the unity of nations should not be regarded as being synonymous with the Lesser Peace, yet from a House letter from the 80's it appears

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-01 Thread Mark A. Foster
are influenced by His Revelation. We know, however, that peace will come in stages. First, there will come the Lesser Peace, when the unity of nations will be achieved... The wording of the last sentence, unless I'm seriously mistaken, surely indicates that they used to think the two would

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-01 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv The wording of the last sentence, unless I'm seriously mistaken, surely indicates that they used to think the two would happen at the same time? Dear David, That's my impression as well. warmest, Susan __ You are

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-01 Thread Ursus Maximus
of peace among the nations; therefore, all the forces which are focused on accomplishing these ends are influenced by His Revelation. We know, however, that peace will come in stages. First, there will come the Lesser Peace, when the unity of nations will be achieved... The wording of the last

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-01 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv My problem is, it seems to me that most Baha'is including famous ones who speak at Conferences and etc. probably do not find my understanding acceptable. This obviously worries me. Dear Ron, I think we've discussed this issue many times before. They may not share

Re: Unity of nations

2009-01-01 Thread Mark A. Foster
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Ursus Maximus wrote: This is the first time I've encountered the term plenary inerrancy'. I would appreciate it if you would expand on this term and its application to our Faith. It is important to me. Hi, Ron: In Protestantism, there are two major views of