Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 12 Oct 2009 9:50:50 pm Arvind Jamuna Dixit wrote: > Any documentation on virtualenv that shows how to manage multiple python > installations. > I tried googling for it and all I could get was how to manage multiple > libraries or python modules. for django I used this: http://justindrisc

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 12 Oct 2009 5:00:44 pm Arvind Jamuna Dixit wrote: > Has anyone here tried installing multiple versions of python ( say 2.6 and > 3.0 ) > onto a Fedora system ( specifically fedora 11 )? yes - use virtualenv to run multiple pythons and multiple anything python. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalv

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Shivaraj M S
>> Any documentation on virtualenv that shows how to manage multiple python installations. This may make things easier if you are sure of using virtualenv. http://www.doughellmann.com/docs/virtualenvwrapper. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Running-multiple-versions-o

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Pradeep Gowda
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Arvind Jamuna Dixit wrote: > Has anyone here tried installing multiple versions of python ( say 2.6 and > 3.0 ) > onto a Fedora system ( specifically fedora 11 )? Having multiple versions on the same machine is not the problem. Most distros already ship with at le

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Arvind Jamuna Dixit
Any documentation on virtualenv that shows how to manage multiple python installations. I tried googling for it and all I could get was how to manage multiple libraries or python modules. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Amit Saha wrote: > Shivaraj M S wrote: > >> I don't see any problems in ins

Re: [BangPypers] Perl or Python ?

2009-10-12 Thread Carl Karsten
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Gopinath R wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> It is my pleasure finding this mailing list. I am a Open Source guy. but not >> an expert. I m strong in Shell Scripting. I need to learn one more open >> source langu

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Amit Saha
Shivaraj M S wrote: I don't see any problems in installing 'n' number of versions on any *nix flavour . If you find any problem please paste the traceback. You can always set /usr/bin/python to direct whichever version you want, and even keep multiple easy_install scripts. IMHO, +1 for 'virt

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Shivaraj M S
I don't see any problems in installing 'n' number of versions on any *nix flavour . If you find any problem please paste the traceback. You can always set /usr/bin/python to direct whichever version you want, and even keep multiple easy_install scripts. ardsrk wrote: > > Hi, > > Has anyone

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Arvind Jamuna Dixit wrote: > I prefer system wide. > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Arvind Jamuna Dixit >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Has anyone here tried installing multiple versions of python ( s

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Arvind Jamuna Dixit
I prefer system wide. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Arvind Jamuna Dixit > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Has anyone here tried installing multiple versions of python ( say 2.6 > and > > 3.0 ) > > onto a Fedora system ( specifically fedora 11 )

Re: [BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Arvind Jamuna Dixit wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone here tried installing multiple versions of python ( say 2.6 and > 3.0 ) > onto a Fedora system ( specifically fedora 11 )? System wide or for a single user? -- ~noufal http://nibrahim.net.in

[BangPypers] Running multiple versions of python on Fedora

2009-10-12 Thread Arvind Jamuna Dixit
Hi, Has anyone here tried installing multiple versions of python ( say 2.6 and 3.0 ) onto a Fedora system ( specifically fedora 11 )? -Arvind ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Ruchir Shukla
def __init__(self) return 0 what is this?? __init__ and with return :O and also where is " *:* " On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Baiju Muthukadan wrote: > http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython > > Don't start a flame war now, please ;) > > -- > Baiju M > _

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Chitipothu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Rajeev J Sebastian > wrote: >> >> >> > I am not however a fan of the decimal module since it uses strings as >> > the >> > base type. >> >> What else should it use then ? > >  Nothing. It shou

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Chitipothu
xkcd cartoon on floating point issues: http://www.xkcd.com/217/ Anand ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Rajeev J Sebastian < rajeev.sebast...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am not however a fan of the decimal module since it uses strings as the > > base type. > > What else should it use then ? > Nothing. It should be taken care of in the float implementation without

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Chitipothu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anand Chitipothu >>> wrote: On Mon,

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Chitipothu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anand Chitipothu >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Baiju Muthukadan >>> wrote: >>> > http://bitc

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai < abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai < > abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai < >> abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Rajeev J Sebastian
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anand Chitipothu > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Baiju Muthukadan >> wrote: >> > http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython >> > >> > Don't start a flame war now, please ;) >> >> 2.3

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai < abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai < > abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anand Chitipothu >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Ba

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai < abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Baiju Muthukadan >> wrote: >> > http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython >> > >> > Don't start a flame war now, pl

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: [..] > It looks like number of decimal digits printed are 17 in Python, 16 in > Haskell and 15 in Ruby. > > Is there any way to change that behavior in Python? [..] I guess it would be from the __repr__ from the int object? That's implement

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Baiju Muthukadan > wrote: > > http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython > > > > Don't start a flame war now, please ;) > > 2.3 - 3.4 and 2/3.0 in Python, Ruby and Haskell interpreters. > > $ python3.0 > Python 3.

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Chitipothu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Baiju Muthukadan wrote: > http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython > > Don't start a flame war now, please ;) 2.3 - 3.4 and 2/3.0 in Python, Ruby and Haskell interpreters. $ python3.0 Python 3.0.1 (r301:69597, Feb 14 2009, 19:03:52) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5490)]

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 12 Oct 2009 2:42:50 pm Baiju Muthukadan wrote: > http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython > > Don't start a flame war now, please ;) why should I when you have already started one? -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Senior Project Officer NRC-FOSS http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/

Re: [BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Baiju Muthukadan wrote: > http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython > > Don't start a flame war now, please ;) > I had a good laugh. Many of his comments are broken including the "try...catch" comment. He also seems to be living on the fringes of Python world where e

Re: [BangPypers] Perl or Python ?

2009-10-12 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It is my pleasure finding this mailing list. I am a Open Source guy. but not > an expert. I m strong in Shell Scripting. I need to learn one more open > source language for excellent job opportunities. > > I am bit confused in c

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread sudhakar s
Hi, itz good to learn python check out "A Byte of Python" By *Swaroop* CH On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > Hi i m learning python mainly for job opportunities. so is it much > difficult if i learn 2.6 and th

Re: [BangPypers] Perl or Python ?

2009-10-12 Thread Zaki Manian
In terms of job opportunities, Perl vs Python opportunities breakdown by field but python adoption is expanding rapidly. Python is used frequently in web application development which creates a lot of job opportunities. The must substantial difference between perl and python is stylistic. Python

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 12 Oct 2009 2:03:35 pm Gopinath R wrote: > Hi i m learning python mainly for job opportunities. so is it much > difficult if i learn 2.6 and then to update to 3.0 ? if it is for job, then most production platforms are still on 2.4 and 2.5 (very few on 2.6) -- regards kg http://lawgon.l

Re: [BangPypers] Perl or Python ?

2009-10-12 Thread Roshan Mathews
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > i should go for PERL or PYTHON. Which one is powerful and will give you more > job opportunities? > http://www.slideshare.net/Tim.Bunce/perl-myths-200909 seems to suggest that there are more Perl jobs. But then I haven't seen many myself. Rosh

Re: [BangPypers] Perl or Python ?

2009-10-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 12 Oct 2009 2:09:39 pm Gopinath R wrote: > i should go for PERL or PYTHON. Which one is powerful and will give you > more job opportunities? since this is a python list, I would say python - go to a perl list, and they would say perl and guess what they would say on a ruby list? -- reg

[BangPypers] A link I found today

2009-10-12 Thread Baiju Muthukadan
http://bitcheese.net/wiki/nopython Don't start a flame war now, please ;) -- Baiju M ___ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

[BangPypers] Perl or Python ?

2009-10-12 Thread Gopinath R
Hi everyone, It is my pleasure finding this mailing list. I am a Open Source guy. but not an expert. I m strong in Shell Scripting. I need to learn one more open source language for excellent job opportunities. I am bit confused in choosing it. I need your suggestions i should go for PERL or PYT

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Gopinath R
Hi i m learning python mainly for job opportunities. so is it much difficult if i learn 2.6 and then to update to 3.0 ? Thanks. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Navin Kabra wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Navin Kabra wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R w

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Navin Kabra
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Navin Kabra wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > >> I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version is >> recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. I believe 3.0 has lot more features >> added, there is no backward c

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Navin Kabra
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version is > recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. I believe 3.0 has lot more features > added, there is no backward compatibility in that. we cannot use some of the > 2.6 syntaxe

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > So Noufal, > > what ure suggesting me. Shall i start learning with python 3.0 ? Nope. I'm pointing out what I feel the most important difference as far as usage is concerned is and then asking you to take a decision by yourself. -- ~noufal

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Baiju Muthukadan
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: [snip] > I believe the only real reason to stick with a pre 3.0 release is 3rd > party library availability. BTW, Now 'distribute' ( http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute ) has Python 3.x support. If you want to create distribution package

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 12 Oct 2009 12:53:26 pm Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version > > is recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. > > I believe 3.0 has lot more features added, there is no backward > > compatibility in that. we cannot u

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Gopinath R
So Noufal, what ure suggesting me. Shall i start learning with python 3.0 ? ** On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version > is > > r

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Roshan Mathews
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version is > recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. > http://diveintopython3.org/ has been released, so maybe you can start with 3.0 but OTOH, I don't know Python 3.0, so you shoul

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Anand Balachandran Pillai
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > Hi all, > > I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version is > recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. > I believe 3.0 has lot more features added, there is no backward > compatibility in that. we cannot use some of the

Re: [BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R wrote: > Hi all, > > I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version is > recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. > I believe 3.0 has lot more features added, there is no backward > compatibility in that. we cannot use some of the

[BangPypers] New to python - neuron ring

2009-10-12 Thread Gopinath R
Hi all, I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version is recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. I believe 3.0 has lot more features added, there is no backward compatibility in that. we cannot use some of the 2.6 syntaxes in that. for Example: raw_input. it worries me a lo