Hello list,
is there an easy way to show all (successful) backup jobs per client,
other than diving into the DB?
This could be useful to check restore points in time I can offer to
users.
Thanks in advance
Cheers Jan
--
Anfragen bitte an it-supp...@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
Please send requests to it-s
Yes, I know this discussion arose a year ago... but I have found that I'm not
actually getting full backups of each zone.
It seems that there are ZFS filesystems that I can't access directly from the
global zone. (Maybe I'm making a simply mistake on the Solaris side here?
Dunno...)
I re-p
Hi Bruno,
thats one way.
What about an optinal option at each client definition? This should be a
better way than a restore job for each client...
Regards
Stefan
Am 30.08.2016 um 19:16 schrieb Bruno Friedmann:
> I've opened a bug (sorry hard to find its id back with my phone)
> About the fact
I've opened a bug (sorry hard to find its id back with my phone)
About the fact that changing defjobs in the interface doesn't change the where
location.
I'm using a dedicated restorewindefjob for windows where location is setup to
D:/restores for example. Once resolved half of your request shou
Beside jorg's advise localhost on modern system can also resolv ::1 the ipv6
address. So be sure to be able to connect to it telnet ::1 9101 sould answer. ..
À lun. août 29 23:46:15 2016 GMT+0200, Stefan Klatt a écrit :
> Hi Jörg,
>
> I use bareos 16.3.1 (01Jul16) on two server and have a littl
On 08/29/16 11:23 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> We're using Bareos 15 to backup, among other things, a Sun SPARC server
> running multiple Solaris-10-branded zones under Solaris 11.3.
>
> I see two ways to backup the entire server:
>
> a) back up the entire output from "zfs send -D -R" ; this would
On 08/26/16 10:13 PM, Douglas K. Rand wrote:
> I'm testing some disaster recovery scenarios and I'm having problems
> with the bls and bextract commands and encrypted LTO tapes.
>
> Running bls results in the tape looking empty except for the header:
>
> % sudo bls -V ND /dev/nsa0
> bls: buti
On 08/25/16 03:53 PM, geo...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I receive annoying mails from bareos director with subject containing 4
> "*none*" in subject each time I use bconsole or bat (under windows) :
> SUBJECT: Bareos: *None* *None* for*None* *None*
> MESSAGE: 25-Aug 13:56 bkbad01-dir: Console
Am 29.08.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Stefan Klatt:
> Hi Jörg,
>
> I use bareos 16.3.1 (01Jul16) on two server and have a little problem
> with bconsole. It needs a long time to connect to the director on the
> same machine.
> With 15.2.2 this was really fast.
I assume, it might be a DNS lookup problem.
Hi David,
did you work with this scripts to create the needed database/tables?
su postgres -c "/usr/lib/bareos/scripts/create_bareos_database"
su postgres -c "/usr/lib/bareos/scripts/make_bareos_tables"
su postgres -c "/usr/lib/bareos/scripts/grant_bareos_privileges"
?
Regards
Stefan
Am 27.08
Hi Jörg,
> I understand your point of view, however I do not see this big impact,
> as adding a resource (e.g. a profile) will not change Bareos behavior.
I use the config files "Daemon.conf" and "Standard.conf" for message
configuration. If I update bareos it writes it's own message
configuration
Hi Jörg,
> As an administrator you still got the chance to disable this behavior,
> by using a non-default Bareos configuration directory (either change the
> service file or create a /etc/bareos/bareos-dir.conf with following
> content: @/etc/my-bareos-config/bareos-dir.d/*/*.conf).
A good idea..
Hi Jörg,
I use bareos 16.3.1 (01Jul16) on two server and have a little problem
with bconsole. It needs a long time to connect to the director on the
same machine.
With 15.2.2 this was really fast.
Regards
Stefan
--
*CaC, Computer and Communication*
Inhaber Stefan Klatt
End-2-End Senior Network
Hi,
Is there a way to configure the Web interface restore directory per client?
I think this is very helpful for different clients running under windows
and linux with or without samba.
Stefan
--
*CaC, Computer and Communication*
Inhaber Stefan Klatt
End-2-End Senior Network Consultant
Triftstra
Hi Bruno,
> I also undestand that I will have to at least let now bareos-dir.d directory
> writeable by bareos users. I tend to be more strict in the configuration
> directory that only root or dedicated owner can write and bareos user can
> only read.
Like I understand bareos need minimum wri
Hi Mailing List,
i can't get a bareos-sd to work with a bareos-dir on another machine.
Labeling and changing of tapes works, but everytime i start a job, i get "Fatal
error: Storage daemon rejected Job command: 3915 Bad Job command
I know that this is typical for a version mismatch of Director
El lunes, 29 de agosto de 2016, 9:20:11 (UTC-3), Natalio Gatti escribió:
> I have a working bareos with 3 file storages and 15 clients. Each client is
> configured to save data on one particular storage.
> My Volumes are labeled automatically, each with only one backup:
>
> Label Format =
> "${
Am 29.08.2016 um 22:28 schrieb Bruno Friedmann:
[...]
> I'm expecting that on 16.2 it will just use what I give to it, the
> new structure (migrated by hand once) and just play nicely with.
yes. I'll work with old bareos-*.conf config files and the bareos-*.d
configuration directory.
> I deeply h
18 matches
Mail list logo
