Re: [basex-talk] Timeframe for supporting fn:load-xquery-module()?

Hi all, Thanks so much, Christian - I didn't mean to chase you for an answer, just unsure who can see what where, and also wanted to ensure your answer was visible on this forum :) Eliot, SchXslt that Daniel mentions is well worth a look - the de facto reference implementation now that the "skeleto

Re: [basex-talk] Timeframe for supporting fn:load-xquery-module()?

XQS looks like an interesting approach, thanks for the pointer. I guess you do know about it, but if you do not, for "an implementation of Schematron that would work well with BaseX" I use SchXslt quite heavily, which can be installed with your BaseX installation with the REPO command, see http

Re: [basex-talk] Timeframe for supporting fn:load-xquery-module()?

I am very interested in an implementation of Schematron that would work well with BaseX—we use Schematron very heavily at ServiceNow and I have been trying to implement some Schematron features in our Mirabel BaseX application, although I’ve had very little time to work on it. We are trying to i

Re: [basex-talk] Timeframe for supporting fn:load-xquery-module()?

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your mail. I've seen your and Adam’s comment, but I didn't have time yet to give a reply. We’ll add an implementation of fn:load-xquery-module in BaseX 11, which is planned for Summer/Fall this year. A proof-of-concept implementation will be made available with BaseX 10.7 or