Not between 2 versions not next to each other (20120509 and
20100107). But it happens that the change occurred between the latest
(20120509) and the directly previous one (2010).
Fine!
I have updated the snapshot [1]; both 'content' and the abbrev
directory will now be detected.
Hi,
That's correct Andy, that has changed some time ago, based on some feedback.
For what it's worth, in the implementation for Saxon and Calabash, I
support both for a transitional period (if 'content' is there, that's
the new model, if a dir with the package name exists, then that's the
Not between 2 versions not next to each other (20120509 and
20100107). But it happens that the change occurred between the latest
(20120509) and the directly previous one (2010). So you can
follow the link Revision markup, which is the diff version from an
edition against the previous one:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older
version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed.
Christian
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce bunce.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current
38 minutes between the email with the links, and a new build being
publicly released on the website. BaseX and Saxon are the 2 most
incredibly reactive companies to solve stuff! (and BaseX always makes
them available on a public snapshot!)
--
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
Hi,
It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of
the spec reads:
the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named *content*, containing
the components and any other file the package needs.
http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor
A previous version
6 matches
Mail list logo
