Rod Whitby wrote:
Jamie, do you intend to include the second part of the patch in BBDB
distribution (the part that allows the STRING field of the
auto-notes-alist record to be a string, integer or function) ?
Sure, looks fine.
If so, I will hack some more on the extract-field function to
The bbdb-print distributed with bbdb 1.48 was not the latest version.
The people who reported problems to me should try the latest version; I
believe that your bugs have previously been fixed.
I put the newest version for anonymous ftp in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:pub/bbdb-print-2.3.shar, in plain and
Rod Jamie, do you intend to include the second part of the patch in
Rod BBDB distribution (the part that allows the STRING field of the
Rod auto-notes-alist record to be a string, integer or function) ?
Jamie Sure, looks fine.
Here is a small suggestion. If the item is a
Rod Jamie, do you intend to include the second part of the patch
Rod in BBDB distribution (the part that allows the STRING field
Rod of the auto-notes-alist record to be a string, integer or
Rod function) ?
Jamie Sure, looks fine.
Joe Here is a small suggestion. If the
