Rod Whitby wrote:
>
> Jamie, do you intend to include the second part of the patch in BBDB
> distribution (the part that allows the STRING field of the
> auto-notes-alist record to be a string, integer or function) ?
Sure, looks fine.
> If so, I will hack some more on the extract-field function to return
> the message body contents when a magic field is requested (is "Body" a
> good name for the magic field ? Can you suggest a better name ?).
You don't want to have the entire message body returned as a string, that's
really wasteful if the message is large (and even if it's not.) Probably
you ought to make a hook function call `bbdb-header-start' and search the
message body in place.
-- Jamie
