Re: BBDB 2.2 released

2001-01-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ronan Waide writes: : > ;;; file-version: 3 : Shouldn't be a problem. I checked this before releasing. OK. I'll give it a try and let you know. Now, where did I put my source forge... Warner ___ bbdb-info mailing list

Re: BBDB 2.2 released

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Yes. I seem to recall there was some problem making the automatic > conversion from > > ;;; file-version: 3 > > that I have. Has that been fixed? > > Warner Shouldn't be a problem. I checked this before releasing. Waider. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes,

Re: BBDB 2.2 released

2001-01-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ronan Waide writes: : It should automatically convert the file for you. Just to be on the : safe side, MAKE A BACKUP FIRST. I keep my .bbdb file in CVS :-) I'll do a cvs commit before I try the conversion. Actually, I'll try the conversion on a different machine

Re: BBDB 2.2 released

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Way cool! I'll have to give it a spin. > > I do have one question, however. I'm running > > BBDB version 2.00.01 ($Date: 1998/04/11 07:26:05 $) > > What kind of pain am I setting myself up for by upgrading to 2.2 :-) > I have 17k lines in my .bbdb

Re: BBDB 2.2 released

2001-01-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ronan Waide writes: : I've offically nailed BBDB-2.2 in CVS. Release notes, freshmeat : uploads, website changes, etc. are still in progress, but... Way cool! I'll have to give it a spin. I do have one question, however. I'm running BBDB version 2.00.01 ($Date:

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > There's a fairly ancient package called gnus-bbdb.el floating around > that works for me; you define a field in the bbdb record that directs > gnus to file the mail. > > It works fine, but doesn't currently play nice with fancy splitting. > Here's a URL: >

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-26 Thread James Felix Black
There's a fairly ancient package called gnus-bbdb.el floating around that works for me; you define a field in the bbdb record that directs gnus to file the mail. It works fine, but doesn't currently play nice with fancy splitting. Here's a URL: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/edmonds/usenet/gnus/gnu

Catching up on my mailbox (was Re: Where I'd like bbdb to go)

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On April 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Hi Waider, > > I had to do some nasty things to achieve the following behaviour: > > - I don't want BBDB entries for mail from mailing lists. I use > bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist for that. > > - If I do get an email not caught by that list I want to b

Re: cvs update blew away configure; and I don't have autoconf

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Fair enough. Modifying .cvsignore to include configure seems to have > solved the problem. I guess I don't grok CVS well enough to > understand the problem but I don't want to cause any pain. I wonder > if adding configure to .cvsignore in the repository

Re: cvs update blew away configure; and I don't have autoconf

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > It's a simple rule: generated files shouldn't be in CVS, > > because that way lies pain and hassle. > > Does this also apply to the gzipped tar archive of BBDB 2.20 I find in > the html directory? :-) > > Ch

Re: cvs update blew away configure; and I don't have autoconf

2001-01-26 Thread Raymond Scholz
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > It's a simple rule: generated files shouldn't be in CVS, > because that way lies pain and hassle. Does this also apply to the gzipped tar archive of BBDB 2.20 I find in the html directory? :-) Cheers, Ray -- Raymond Scholz - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGP

Re: cvs update blew away configure; and I don't have autoconf

2001-01-26 Thread David S. Goldberg
Fair enough. Modifying .cvsignore to include configure seems to have solved the problem. I guess I don't grok CVS well enough to understand the problem but I don't want to cause any pain. I wonder if adding configure to .cvsignore in the repository would be appropriate, though since it's alread

Re: cvs update blew away configure; and I don't have autoconf

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Actually, I do have autoconf, but not a sufficiently recent version to > generate the configure script and I don't want to wait for my sysadmin > to install it. Could someone please add the configure script to the > repository? All other CVS repositories

cvs update blew away configure; and I don't have autoconf

2001-01-26 Thread David S. Goldberg
Actually, I do have autoconf, but not a sufficiently recent version to generate the configure script and I don't want to wait for my sysadmin to install it. Could someone please add the configure script to the repository? All other CVS repositories (gnus, w3 etc) provide the configure script. T

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-26 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I've got a brutally ugly and hard-to-maintain nnmail-split-fancy > variable in my .gnus file and I vaguely remember someone having > documented some way to add something to a bbdb record, and then have > gnus magically file emails sent to that person into t

Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-26 Thread Jack Twilley
I've got a brutally ugly and hard-to-maintain nnmail-split-fancy variable in my .gnus file and I vaguely remember someone having documented some way to add something to a bbdb record, and then have gnus magically file emails sent to that person into the right folder. Does this exist? Am I dreami