> I've just started trying to use SyncBBDB to syncronize records between
> BBDB and my Palm III. It looks great, I think that I will finally be
> able to have addresses stay in sync on both. I have it working now
> for the most part, but I have encountered a number of
> problems/inconvenienc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> On 01 Feb 2001, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> > This still doesn't shut it clear up. I think there should be a
> > switch that makes bbdb just hold what you give it to hold, record
> > what you tell it to record and shut clear up about anything else.
>
>
hi folks,
there have been a fair number of problems that have been found in the
latest 'official' release of bbdb. as such, i'm wondering if there are
plans for an incremental release.
i haven't used CVS and i'd prefer not to learn all about it just to
fix my bbdb problems. however, if that's ho
> Kelsey Jordahl writes:
> 1) Some category names are not set going from BBDB->Palm. As
> far as I can tell, this only happens when there is more than one
> phone number and/or email address. When viewing the record, the
> fields come out without any label at all, or sometim
Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Adam" == Adam C Finnefrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adam> I only use gnus-private, so that I can have per-user sorting,
> Adam> without an regexp entry for each person in BBDB.
>
> So each related BBDB entry has a gnus-private tag, right?
On 13 Feb 2001, Jack Twilley wrote:
> Yes, but you can't embed bbdb/gnus-split-method in
> nnmail-split-fancy.
Why not? Doesn't it work just like nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent?
But I've never used it.
Maybe if it isn't possible to embed, then bbdb/gnus-split-method
should be changed?
kai
--
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Paul Franklin wrote:
> Besides, C-g letter is reserved for personalized key bindings, but
> C-g C-letter isn't, so this change is a good thing regardless.
ITYM C-c, not C-g.
kai
--
Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.
___
[EMAIL
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Isn't it time to switch electric mode off by default? Few people seem
> to like it, and no matter how good the documentation or how profuse
> the apologies it will always confuse new users otherwise.
This is exactly why, I imagine, jwz was sorry he im
> On February 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > IMHO electricity in BBDB is just not insulated well enough. I prefer
> > to turn it off, lest I get a shock. Maybe some day it will be fixed.
> > But until then, I'm a happy non-electric BBDB user.
>
> There's a comment either on the old list archi
On February 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> IMHO electricity in BBDB is just not insulated well enough. I prefer
> to turn it off, lest I get a shock. Maybe some day it will be fixed.
> But until then, I'm a happy non-electric BBDB user.
There's a comment either on the old list archives or in the
On February 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Just making sure it didn't get lost. :)
>
> Alex.
Will be in CVS shortly.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit.
___
On February 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> i'm not sure how to describe it. when i'm reading a mail folder and
> move from one message to another, the window showing the message (not
> the summary window) flashes briefly. it appears that the entire mail
> header is displayed for a usecond and then s
12 matches
Mail list logo
