On , March 27 2001 22:30:54, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> Technically, `To: ' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
> `To: foo' or `To: bla '.
>
> Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
> what you accept, and so on...
Well it is accepting those, but not " Anothe
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My guess: One of the headers (From,To,Reply-To), probably
> the Reply-To header is not extracted correctly, as the
> closing ">" seems to be missing.
>
> Do a "M-: (mail-fetch-field "Reply-To") RET"
> Does it return the complete header content?
>
> Rem
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday, March 27 2001 20:58:07, Ronan Waide wrote:
>
> > Can you generate a stacktrace for this?
>
> One usually would not get a stack trace for this unless
> bbdb-extract-address-component-handler is set to 'error,
> which is not the default.
I did
Norbert Koch writes:
> Another header version which bbdb dislikes is
> 'To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)'.
It works for me (BBDB version 2.00.06).
See my `From'.
Did this get broken?
--
Colin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/
