Displaying Xfaces in bbdb buffer

2001-08-03 Thread Steve Youngs
In the last 2 years that I've used BBDB I have seen xfaces in the bbdb buffer *once*. The manual says that it should just happen if you have xface support compiled into your XEmacs. Well, apart from that one off occasion, it doesn't for me. Is there anything I need to set for this to work? --

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-03 Thread Thomas E Deweese
DG == David S Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DG I want a full listing, in multiple lines, minus a couple fields. DG Robert's patch does this. bbdb-elided-display does not. Yes, it does... DG [...] DG Thanks! Is that new in the 2.3* versions? I don't think so, but it's hard to

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-03 Thread David S. Goldberg
DG I want a full listing, in multiple lines, minus a couple fields. DG Robert's patch does this. bbdb-elided-display does not. Yes, it does... [...] Thanks! Is that new in the 2.3* versions? I don't recall that being possible previously. The only question then would be is there an

Re: Strange completion

2001-08-03 Thread Ronan Waide
On July 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hm. Maybe I can start liking the new behavior. But of course, BBDB should work right even if the variable is nil ;-) kai Okay, well, I've just checked in the change that fixes the original problem anyway. And hopefully I haven't broken any of Robert's