On May 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> No luck. :-(
>
> It seems to me that the functions of bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook
> influence only the email address, the name that was extracted by
> mail-extract-address-components is not passed to the hook (see
> bbdb-annotate-message-sender function in bbdb
On 13 May 2002, Robert Fenk wrote:
> Try adding a "(setq name nil)" in the function
> my-bbdb-normalize-tmda-addresses ...
No luck. :-(
It seems to me that the functions of bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook
influence only the email address, the name that was extracted by
mail-extract-address-component
On Monday, May 13, 2002 at 21:15:31, Andras BALI wrote:
[...]
> I have a record, with the name "Joe Foo", email "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Now I
> get a message from him, which has the following From field:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> BBDB correctly recognizes that the email address is "[EMAIL PR
On 13 May 2002, Matt Armstrong wrote:
> I'm not sure why you have the backtick (`) in your regexp. Maybe that
> is causing the problem. Here is the regexp I use (the code is part of
> a cond call):
>((string-match
> "^\\(.+?\\)\\(.\\)dated\\2[0-9]+\\.[0-9a-fA-F]+\\(@.*\\)" addr)
>
Andras BALI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using latest CVS of BBDB and Gnus with Emacs21. In order to store
> the correct email addresses of people who use TMDA, I use this code:
>
> (defun my-bbdb-normalize-tmda-addresses (addr)
> "Removes TMDA-related strings from addresses."
>
Hi.
I'm using latest CVS of BBDB and Gnus with Emacs21. In order to store
the correct email addresses of people who use TMDA, I use this code:
(defun my-bbdb-normalize-tmda-addresses (addr)
"Removes TMDA-related strings from addresses."
(when addr
(cond ((string-match
(concat
