Re: bbdb + gmane address-encrypted groups

2004-01-23 Thread Ted Stern
On 23 Jan 2004, Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote: > > PS: I have no idea what you mean by a gmane-address and I am > to tired to digging for it by myself ... providing an > example gmane-address/message might help ... > Look at any of the last 10 or so messages under gmane.comp.tex.pdftex.

Re: early versions of bbdb < 1.43?

2004-01-23 Thread Bill White
On Fri Jan 23 2004 at 02:46, Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > * Bill White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Does anyone have an early version of bbdb lying about somewhere, > > something earlier than 1.43? The earlier the better. 1.43 is the > > oldest I've found via google. > > H

Re: bbdb + gmane address-encrypted groups

2004-01-23 Thread Robert Widhopf-Fenk
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 11:28:45, Mats Lidell wrote: > > Robert wrote: > > Robert> Is `bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook' what you are looking for? > > I don't think so because this hook is used to change the address > into something but the gmain address can't be decoded into something > u

Re: early versions of bbdb < 1.43?

2004-01-23 Thread Robert Marshall
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Steve Youngs wrote: > * Bill White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Does anyone have an early version of bbdb lying about somewhere, > > something earlier than 1.43? The earlier the better. 1.43 is > > the oldest I've found via google. > > Have you asked jwz? > I

Re: early versions of bbdb < 1.43?

2004-01-23 Thread Steve Youngs
* Bill White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone have an early version of bbdb lying about somewhere, > something earlier than 1.43? The earlier the better. 1.43 is the > oldest I've found via google. Have you asked jwz? -- |-| | Ashes to ashes, du