Grr. Forgot the @cindex Bug Reports...
Alex.
*** bbdb.texinfo06 Aug 2003 11:06:01 +0200 1.51
--- bbdb.texinfo09 Oct 2004 00:28:20 +0200
***
*** 1046,1051
--- 1046,1052
@ref{Gnus Prep}. For usage details, see @ref{Gnus Features}. The field used
What do you think of the following patch?
*** bbdb.texinfo06 Aug 2003 11:06:01 +0200 1.51
--- bbdb.texinfo09 Oct 2004 00:27:01 +0200
***
*** 1046,1051
--- 1046,1052
@ref{Gnus Prep}. For usage details, see @ref{Gnus Features}. The field used
ca
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bbdb-insert-new-field: there already are notes!
> Well you could have told me earlier.
Indeed. Never noticed until now.
> Also there is no bug reporting item in that index.
That's true. I'll add something. The section Known Bugs doesn't tell
us anyt
On October 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> What would be the right handheld computer, PDA, Palm, etc. for a BBDB
> user who hopes to at least copy their BBDB database to a handheld?
jwz described in detail some time ago the problems with making BBDB
and the Palm addressbook fit into each other's spac
