On 2012-09-10 12:21 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
Is this all?? Let's see what pops up next...
There is one buglet that is pretty annoying i.e. after
bbdb-transpose-fields point is moved to the beginning of the record. I
think it should stay in the same field of the record before and after
the
On 2012-08-31 23:28 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
The MUA commands of BBDB come in sets:
- bbdb-mua-display-records, bbdb-mua-display-sender,
bbdb-mua-display-recipients
- bbdb-mua-annotate-sender, bbdb-mua-annotate-recipients
- bbdb-mua-edit-field, bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender,
I have these commits sitting in my local git repo and I think they might
be good for upstream so I am posting them here.
From 90ec35b4ef69ef37337d104fe08c447af5ce7da8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leo sdl@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:02:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] Add bbdb-load-hook
So I replaced the call of gnus-fetch-field by
gnus-fetch-original-field. Let me know if now
bbdb-ignore-message-alist works for you as expected.
Using X-* headers in `bbdb-ignore-message-alist' appears to be working now.
Thanks!
Mitch
Mitchel Humpherys mitch.spec...@gmail.com writes:
Does something like
(From. The Bug Tracking System)
in your `bbdb-ignore-message-alist' not work?
Ah, thanks. I haven't managed to upgrade my bbdb customizations to V3
yet, so I'll keep this in my pocket until I can upgrade
On Mon Sep 10 2012 Leo wrote:
The first group should display info without querying users for anything
and it should also display something when some contacts are not in the
database.
(defadvice bbdb-mua-display-sender (after sender-not-found-feedback
activate)
Give user feedback when
On Mon Sep 10 2012 Leo wrote:
The first group should display info without querying users for anything
I forgot to say: The above is exactly the default of BBDB v3.
The default car of bbdb-mua-update-interactive-p is 'search.
On Mon Sep 10 2012 Leo wrote:
I have these commits sitting in my local git repo and I think they might
be good for upstream so I am posting them here.
Thanks. I need to check these more carefully
--
Live Security
On Mon Sep 10 2012 Leo wrote:
On 2012-09-10 12:21 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
Is this all?? Let's see what pops up next...
There is one buglet that is pretty annoying i.e. after
bbdb-transpose-fields point is moved to the beginning of the record. I
think it should stay in the same field
