On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
I thought more about this, and I do not believe anymore that simply
replacing calls of (buffer-)substring with (buffer-)substring-no-properties
throughout BBDB is a meaningful strategy.
- In the future, it could be
Roland,
For what it's worth, I would like to see text properties kept out of the
db until there is some
need for them. Right now, one of the big pluses for BBDBv3 to my mind
is that it allows two-way syncing with
Sriram's Asynk facility, which is what motivated me to try to make the
move to
On Sun Jan 27 2013 Daniel Doherty wrote:
For what it's worth, I would like to see text properties kept out
of the db until there is some need for them. Right now, one of the
big pluses for BBDBv3 to my mind is that it allows two-way syncing
with Sriram's Asynk facility, which is what motivated
