Ronan Waide writes:
> On March 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > One potential extra complication I just twigged to is that I'm trying
> > to install 2.34 over 2.00 on a system where I have also overridden
> How do you mean "over" 2.0? Is 2.0 in the system path somewhere? If
> you put your local ins
I just wrote:
> Should I try compiling with an emacs that omits even its standard
> startup files (with --no-site-file) ?
It looks as if this is already done. So much for that idea.
Thanks for any help,
Michael.
---
This SF.net email is sp
Ronan Waide writes:
> > Somehow the call to (bbdb-initialise) isn't loading in bbdb-autoloads,
> > or bbdb-autoloads isn't correctly referencing bbdb-vm. If I manually
> > load "bbdb-vm" and then call bbdb-insinuate-vm, I get a little
> > further, before the fact that I have an old format db bites
Ronan Waide writes:
> On January 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > it insists that it still can't find (bbdb-insinuate-vm). My guess is
> > that when the code was being compiled it 'linked' against bogus,
> the BBDB build process makes sure to set the load-path such that it
> "links" against the c
Is it possible that attempting to install 2.34 where there is already
an installation of version "2.00" will cause weird failures?
That seems to be what is happening to me. I have the relevant
directory earlier in the load-path, but after doing a
(bbdb-initialize)
it insists that it still can't
