Ronan Waide writes:
On March 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
One potential extra complication I just twigged to is that I'm trying
to install 2.34 over 2.00 on a system where I have also overridden
How do you mean over 2.0? Is 2.0 in the system path somewhere? If
you put your local
Ronan Waide writes:
Somehow the call to (bbdb-initialise) isn't loading in bbdb-autoloads,
or bbdb-autoloads isn't correctly referencing bbdb-vm. If I manually
load bbdb-vm and then call bbdb-insinuate-vm, I get a little
further, before the fact that I have an old format db bites, and I
I just wrote:
Should I try compiling with an emacs that omits even its standard
startup files (with --no-site-file) ?
It looks as if this is already done. So much for that idea.
Thanks for any help,
Michael.
---
This SF.net email is
Ronan Waide writes:
On January 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
it insists that it still can't find (bbdb-insinuate-vm). My guess is
that when the code was being compiled it 'linked' against bogus,
the BBDB build process makes sure to set the load-path such that it
links against the correct
Is it possible that attempting to install 2.34 where there is already
an installation of version 2.00 will cause weird failures?
That seems to be what is happening to me. I have the relevant
directory earlier in the load-path, but after doing a
(bbdb-initialize)
it insists that it still can't
