Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
Well it is accepting those, but not "foo"!
And it is liberal, since those bad one will generate no
error, but you will get a message complaining about them ...
Yes, I see now what happens. The combination
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)
Reply-To:
Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And now I see it. It happens only if the last displayed
header is one of those where we want to extract addresses,
but unfortunately I have sorted them differently ...
A fix is in CVS and the diff attached!
Thanks for the fix. I'm playing around
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Grojohann) writes:
Hi!
Technically, `To: foo' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
`To: foo' or `To: bla foo'.
Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
what you accept, and so on...
Another header version which bbdb dislikes is
