On Mon, 21 May 2001, Robert Fenk wrote:
> On , May 20 2001 15:14:22, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
>>
>> Since my command does something useful in this case, I think
>> ringing the bell is not the right answer. So is there a way to
>> tell BBDB to not ring the bell?
>
> Now there is one:
Great. I h
On , May 20 2001 15:14:22, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> I've just released a new version of message-x which tries to do
> something useful on unknown headers or in case there is nothing to do
> on the current header.
>
> But if I invoke bbdb-complete-name with point after an
> already-completed name,
I've just released a new version of message-x which tries to do
something useful on unknown headers or in case there is nothing to do
on the current header.
But if I invoke bbdb-complete-name with point after an
already-completed name, then BBDB rings the bell.
Since my command does something us
