On 2012-08-14 05:34 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
However, Leo's proposed change could also affect function names such
as bbdb-record-note and bbdb-record-set-note that address individual
note fields. To be internally consistent, these should become
something like bbdb-record-ext and
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
On Sun Aug 12 2012 Leo wrote:
(bbdb-defstruct record
firstname lastname affix aka organization phone address mail notes cache)
We should rename `notes' in the above to `ext' (for extensions). `notes'
and `note' are both used in the BBDB and they
On Mon Aug 13 2012 Ivan Kanis wrote:
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
On Sun Aug 12 2012 Leo wrote:
(bbdb-defstruct record
firstname lastname affix aka organization phone address mail notes cache)
We should rename `notes' in the above to `ext' (for extensions). `notes'
and
On 2012-08-11 00:30 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
On Sat Aug 11 2012 Leo wrote:
A few weeks ago I upgraded to BBDB git head and experienced some odd
behaviours that I have to revert to my last working copy which is some
months old.
Certainly it would be good if you could post here if anything
Hello,
A few weeks ago I upgraded to BBDB git head and experienced some odd
behaviours that I have to revert to my last working copy which is some
months old.
BBDB2 has some nice tests to ensure regression doesn't happen as often.
Would that be a good idea for bbdb3?
Leo
On Sat Aug 11 2012 Leo wrote:
A few weeks ago I upgraded to BBDB git head and experienced some odd
behaviours that I have to revert to my last working copy which is some
months old.
Certainly it would be good if you could post here if anything
appears to be a true regression.
BBDB2 has some
