Re: Bug#617634: Debian version terribly out of date

2011-03-12 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I was inspired to do a reboot on my git bbdb repo. git://github.com/barak/BBDB.git I re-converted the old CVS repo, with keywords *not* expanded and uids translated to proper names. The branch "upstream" is the result of that process. That is probably what you'd want to consider for savannah.

Re: Bug#617634: Debian version terribly out of date

2011-03-12 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
> I'm working with Roland to migrate BBDB to a Git repository on Savannah. > I can do the migration like you did but wanted to ensure that the > contributor history is correctly mapped and Roland hasn't had time to > work on it. Not sure how much real names instead of uids on the commits is worth:

Re: Bug#617634: Debian version terribly out of date

2011-03-10 Thread jidanni
Dear bbdb-info list members: Barak the Debian package maintainer asks many questions in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617634 . Dear Barak, I am hoping those http://news.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user list members will tell you what to do (as all this is extremely over my head.)

Bug#617634: Debian version terribly out of date

2011-03-09 Thread jidanni
X-debbugs-Cc: bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net Package: bbdb Version: 2.36-2 Dear Debian, your copy of BBDB is terribly out of date. -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best f