Re: Update: Where is BBDB going

2012-12-06 Thread Rene
Wes Hardaker hardaker at users.sourceforge.net writes: Roland Winkler winkler at gnu.org writes: Is this all?? Let's see what pops up next... One missing thing in my book is the bbdb-sc replacement. I loved supercite but haven't been able to use it since going to bbdb3. And,

Re: Update: Where is BBDB going

2012-09-11 Thread Wes Hardaker
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes: Is this all?? Let's see what pops up next... One missing thing in my book is the bbdb-sc replacement. I loved supercite but haven't been able to use it since going to bbdb3. And, seriously, I'm constantly tempted to go back because a better binding

Re: Update: Where is BBDB going

2012-09-10 Thread Leo
On 2012-09-10 12:21 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: Is this all?? Let's see what pops up next... There is one buglet that is pretty annoying i.e. after bbdb-transpose-fields point is moved to the beginning of the record. I think it should stay in the same field of the record before and after the

Re: Update: Where is BBDB going

2012-09-10 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Sep 10 2012 Leo wrote: On 2012-09-10 12:21 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: Is this all?? Let's see what pops up next... There is one buglet that is pretty annoying i.e. after bbdb-transpose-fields point is moved to the beginning of the record. I think it should stay in the same field

Re: Update: Where is BBDB going

2012-09-09 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sun Sep 9 2012 Roland Winkler wrote: I just want to give here a brief update on my further plans with BBDB. Currently, I have three open issues on my BBDB to-do list: - Notes - xfield (see the recent thread name for list of notes fields on this list) - pop up *BBDB* buffer properly