Re: bbdb-2.32 and vm.elc binary install

2001-09-01 Thread Kai Großjohann
david x callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > vm has for some while been distributed (optionally) as a single vm.elc > instead of individual lisp files. can bbdb be made to build with this > setup? Does it help to change to that setup? You can just "cat *.elc > single.elc" and then try to load

Re: bbdb-2.32 and vm.elc binary install

2001-09-01 Thread Kai Großjohann
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, david x. callaway wrote: > > vm has for some while been distributed (optionally) as a single vm.elc >> instead of individual lisp files. can bbdb be made to build with this >> setup? > > That's a really *bad* idea, no matter what.

Re: bbdb-2.32 and vm.elc binary install

2001-08-31 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, david x. callaway wrote: > vm has for some while been distributed (optionally) as a single vm.elc > instead of individual lisp files. can bbdb be made to build with this > setup? That's a really *bad* idea, no matter what. The *compiled* elisp is not going to be the same acro

bbdb-2.32 and vm.elc binary install

2001-08-31 Thread david x callaway
vm has for some while been distributed (optionally) as a single vm.elc instead of individual lisp files. can bbdb be made to build with this setup? thanks dxc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: