Evil Boris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
;; iso-2022-7bit should be OK (but not optimal for Emacs, at least --
;; emacs-mule would be better) with both Emacs 21 and XEmacs. Emacs
;; 22 will really need utf-8-emacs.
Please change the comment, at least :) --- the current CVS Emacs is
going to be
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the current code:
;; iso-2022-7bit should be OK (but not optimal for Emacs, at least --
;; emacs-mule would be better) with both Emacs 21 and XEmacs. Emacs
;; 22 will really need utf-8-emacs.
(defconst bbdb-file-coding-system (if (fboundp
The current CVS version of bbdb.el has bogusly changed the coding
system for .bbdb in Emacs 21 to mule-utf-8. That's not, and never
will be, a universal coding system:
(memq 'mule-utf-8
(find-coding-systems-string (string (make-char 'chinese-gb2312 68 99)
On August 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The current CVS version of bbdb.el has bogusly changed the coding
system for .bbdb in Emacs 21 to mule-utf-8. That's not, and never
will be, a universal coding system:
(memq 'mule-utf-8
(find-coding-systems-string (string (make-char
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On August 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The current CVS version of bbdb.el has bogusly changed the coding
system for .bbdb in Emacs 21 to mule-utf-8. That's not, and never
will be, a universal coding system:
(memq 'mule-utf-8
On August 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Please change the comment, at least :) --- the current CVS Emacs is
I'm pretty sure Dave actually contributed the comment, and I think
this amply demonstrates my point about support for CVS Emacs. If this
code is actively breaking Emacs 22 then by all means
On August 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For what reason? They were wrong anyway, as I said:
I'd have to go digging in the archives to find out. Since you say it's
broken, though, I'll happily remove it.
Yes. The check which would prevent that on saving the file (if I
remember correctly)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David S. Goldberg) writes:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:54:41 +0100, Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Note that the .bbdb file is a normal emacs file in that it doesn't
autosave or anything, so you can always revert to the on-disk
version if you screw things up.
Right.
On August 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I wonder if it would be completely silly to consider putting the BBDB
database through pretty-printer before saving it to .bbdb? This
makes reading it by humans a lot easier and I doubt it would increase
its size all THAT much.
Please PLEASE consult
On August 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The mule-utf-8 stuff was contributed by someone using Emacs 22
For what reason? They were wrong anyway, as I said:
I've taken it out of current CVS.
cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
quit with the wouldn't and
10 matches
Mail list logo
