Thanks...
Vincent.
> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:30:57 -0600
> From: wink...@gnu.org
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: notes field edition
>
> On Thu Jan 2 2014 Vincent Belaïche wro
On Thu Jan 2 2014 Vincent Belaïche wrote:
> The problem is some sort of inconsistency. When I did bbdb-create
> "notes" was proposed, so it looks like some default field
If you customize the new variable bbdb-default-xfield, bbdb-create
will use any xfield you like.
> --- this is all the more tr
By the way: happy new year 2014 and many thanks for BBDB v3.
Vincent.
> From: vincent@hotmail.fr
> To: wink...@gnu.org
> CC: bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: notes field edition
> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:57:53 +0100
@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: notes field edition
>
> On Fri Dec 27 2013 Vincent Belaïche wrote:
>>>From this info node:
>>
>> http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/bbdb.html#SEC33
>>
>> I can read:
>>
>> -
On Fri Dec 27 2013 Vincent Belaïche wrote:
> >From this info node:
>
> http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/bbdb.html#SEC33
>
> I can read:
>
> ---
> ;
>
> (bbdb-edit-notes) A shortcut for editing the notes field.
> ---
It seems that for some reason my answers are blocked somewhere in the pipe...
Vincent.
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 07:30:32 +
> Subject: Re: notes field edition
> From: ba...@cs.nuim.ie
> To: wink...@gnu.org
> CC: bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net; vincent@hotmail.fr
>
&
available, nor the
bbdb-insert-field will propose `notes' like a field.
Maybe there is a misunderstanding by me about what notes are.
Vincent
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 07:30:32 +
> Subject: Re: notes field edition
> From: ba...@cs.nuim.ie
> To: wink...@gnu.org
> CC: bb
On 27 Dec 2013 03:49, "Roland Winkler" wrote:
> I am sorry, I can only guess what you are talking about. In which
> context are you missing a binding of `;' to which command? Is there
> a solution you want to propose?
I'd assume he means that, in pretty much any context in which bbdb is
active,
On Thu Dec 26 2013 Vincent Belaïche wrote:
> It seems that the old keybinding `;' does not work any longer, and
> when using `i' to insert a field, `notes' is not part of the
> pre-defined fields.
I am sorry, I can only guess what you are talking about. In which
context are you missing a binding
Hello,
It seems that the old keybinding `;' does not work any longer, and when
using `i' to insert a field, `notes' is not part of the pre-defined
fields.
Not sure whether that is a bug or not...
Vincent.
--
Rapidly t
10 matches
Mail list logo
