Warren Michelsen wrote:
I need to search for a td/td tag set and everything in between, which may
include line breaks but which must include an anchor.
I use:
td(?s)(.+?)/td
where:
(?s) = search across end of lines
.+? = non-greedy match to anything
--
Garth Fletcher
--
You
I'm using BB Edit grep to select a/a links like this:
(\a.*\\/a)
So I can paste the match using: \1
However, I basically want to delete everything else in the document
except these links, so that all I am left with is the links. Possible
to modify my code to accomplish this? Thanks!
At 09:30 -0700 10/28/09, BB Design wrote:
I'm using BB Edit grep to select a/a links like this:
(\a.*\\/a)
So I can paste the match using: \1
However, I basically want to delete everything else in the document
except these links, so that all I am left with is the links. Possible
to modify my
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:30, BB Design bradbans...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using BB Edit grep to select a/a links like this:
(\a.*\\/a)
So I can paste the match using: \1
However, I basically want to delete everything else in the document
except these links, so that all I am left with is
Hi,
As usual, grep beyond the most basic defeats me. I must suffer from
dysgrepia.
I use the following little thing to add BR tags to the end of lines
I've selected...
Find: \r
Replace: br /\r
...with Selected text only checked.
Even I can do that. ;-)
I use this for poems where I define
Why capture anything? You just want to place the insertion point at the end
of any line that doesn't end in /p or isn't a blank line. Then you just
insert the br / at that point.
Dennis
On 6/8/09 9:44 AM, Ted Burger t...@tobsupport.com wrote:
Ronald,
Shouldn't the Replace be
\1br /)\r
Here's some sample lines:
NOTE:r 307072427\na 0014017578\n\nr 307072427\na 0014017578\nr
307072427\na 0014017\n
NOTE:17 -2nd place (clinton-henry) 0D\nF\: carroll st fr\n\n17 -2nd
place (clinton-henry)
NOTE:Mailing Address\:\nBroadVoice\, Inc.\nPO Box 10\nBi\n\nMailing
Any grep wizards out there?
I'm trying to clean up a bunch of vcards.
After various synchs, I have repeated information in my notes field,
e.g.:
NOTE:blabla\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nunique\nJim's guy
\n\numesh\nJim's guy\n\numesh\n\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nJim's guy\n\numesh
Ze'ev zgi...@gmail.com sez:
I'm trying to clean up a bunch of vcards.
After various synchs, I have repeated information in my notes field,
e.g.:
NOTE:blabla\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nunique\nJim's guy
\n\numesh\nJim's guy\n\numesh\n\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nJim's guy\n\numesh
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:12:39AM -0700, Ze'ev wrote:
Any grep wizards out there?
I'm trying to clean up a bunch of vcards.
After various synchs, I have repeated information in my notes field,
e.g.:
NOTE:blabla\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nJim's guy\n\numesh\nunique\nJim's guy
At 21:22 + on 03/25/2009, Patrick James wrote about Re: Grep help?:
Hi
Assuming each list element is on a new line as per your example I
think that:
ol.+\r(li.+\r){10,}/ol
should select what is required.
I am not up on my GREP but I have an impression that this might catch
cases where
On Mar 25, 2009, at 15:22, Patrick James pjl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Assuming each list element is on a new line as per your example I
think that:
ol.+\r(li.+\r){10,}/ol
should select what is required.
There's no need for negative lookahead.
There is with multiple lists in the same
On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:53 AM, le...@gmail wrote:
On Mar 25, 2009, at 15:22, Patrick James pjl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Assuming each list element is on a new line as per your example I
think that:
ol.+\r(li.+\r){10,}/ol
should select what is required.
There's no need for negative
On 3/25/2009, le...@gmail said:
I know I can do this with a negative look-ahead something or
other, but despite years and years of regexs, I do not grok
that particular mechanism.
I want to search for lists that contain at least 10 list items.
Try this:
On Mar 26, 2009, at 11:39 AM, le...@gmail wrote:
On 26-Mar-2009, at 10:42, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
(?s:([uo]l)[^]*\s*(?li[^]*.*?(?:/li\s*|(?=li))){10,}/\1)
In my test data that only matches against the third list.
---test file
olli1/lili2/lili3li4li5/lili6/
On 26-Mar-2009, at 12:52, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:39:44PM -0600, le...@gmail wrote:
On 26-Mar-2009, at 10:42, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
(?s:([uo]l)[^]*\s*(?li[^]*.*?(?:/li\s*|(?=li))){10,}/\1)
In my test data that only matches against the third list.
---test
On 26-Mar-2009, at 15:04, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
On Mar 26, 2009, at 1:48 PM, le...@gmail wrote:
Yes. Results of Find all
http://home.kreme.com/grepresult.png
If I split it all up into mcultiple lines, then the match works. All
one line (like if the source had been saved in 'compact'
I know I can do this with a negative look-ahead something or other,
but despite years and years of regexs, I do not grok that particular
mechanism.
I want to search for lists that contain at least 10 list items.
ol id=foo
li class=bar...
li...
li class=boo...
li...
li...
li...
li...
li...
Hi
Assuming each list element is on a new line as per your example I
think that:
ol.+\r(li.+\r){10,}/ol
should select what is required.
There's no need for negative lookahead.
Above can be modified to include lists of more than one type, such a s
ol or ul for example and if there are
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
