oops - I hit the send button by accident
here is my point:
I would fold this either at the start of php in this section (if I were
looking at the embedded divs) or at the div (if I were looking at the logic)
- -
IMHO it would be a MAJOR time saver for me to able to to save my current
"view state
thanks for the follow-up - - I do indeed use Interarchy v9.01 but save to
the server via BBEdit. Based on your last suggestion, I did try the
following:
1) set up my folds;
2) saved to my local disk;
3) saved to the server from Interarchy by overwriting current copy;
4) quit BBEdit
5) re-opened B
On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Dennis wrote:
> The same goes for accessing the file with
> Interarchy via SFTP. Interarchy makes a temporary local version of the
> file when you edit it, but always uses the same path so BBEdit can
> find the file's state info.
I guess I should have tested this aga
On Sep 17, 2008, at 11:49 PM, stephen taylor wrote:
> Thanks for the reply - - those preferences are indeed set as
> described- - closed and re-opened and all folds were open on re-
> launch - - maybe this is because I am saving to a server?
By default, BBEdit stores state information in a ce
Thanks for the reply - - those preferences are indeed set as described- -
closed and re-opened and all folds were open on re-launch - - maybe this is
because I am saving to a server?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2008, at 1:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sep 17, 2008, at 1:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone know if it is possible to save the state of folds in a large
> document? I work with large php scripts that are organized with
> "foldable" divs - - that is, certain php logic is within html divs
> that can be folded - - for ease of
Anyone know if it is possible to save the state of folds in a large
document? I work with large php scripts that are organized with
"foldable" divs - - that is, certain php logic is within html divs
that can be folded - - for ease of debugging. It is really a pain to
"reformat" after each re-st
