On Fri, January 6, 2006 4:07 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
> The svn trunk doesn't build against the current softmac git tree... or
> indeed against itself.
>
> --- linux-2.6.15/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c~ 2006-01-03
> 22:56:55.0 +
Thanks, applied.
> --- linux-2.6.15/dr
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:53 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > No, that's needed because it doesn't reassociate if going down and
> > up again.
>
> Will that be fixed at some point, or should I modify my scripts to do
> it automatically?
It'll get fixed in the end, yes. At all times while the device
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:53 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Will that be fixed at some point, or should I modify my scripts to do it
> automatically?
It will be fixed at some point. But I don't know when :)
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Friday, January 6, 2006 1:35 am, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 19:17 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > It may just be that getting an address takes a long time, but it
> > seems like running the 'iwconfig bcm43xx essid virtuousgeek' during
> > the 'ifup' operation gets things going.
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 17:12 +0100, Feyd wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > The _real_ main point I wanted to make was to _not_ use a net_device for
> > the master device. What else should be used for master device, let it
> > be a device node or a netlink socket, is rather unimportant at
> > this s
Michael Buesch wrote:
The _real_ main point I wanted to make was to _not_ use a net_device for
the master device. What else should be used for master device, let it
be a device node or a netlink socket, is rather unimportant at
this stage.
If the only purpose of the master device was configurat
The svn trunk doesn't build against the current softmac git tree... or
indeed against itself.
--- linux-2.6.15/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c~ 2006-01-03
22:56:55.0 +
+++ linux-2.6.15/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c2006-01-03
23:00:15.0 +
@@
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:09 +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> iwconfig eth1 key restriced xx
Does this mean you need shared key authentication on that AP? That's not
supported (yet)
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi everybody
I try to connect to the CiscoAP 1200 on my University with the
bcm43xx-dscpae driver and wpa_supplicant. But it failed. I know that
the wpa_supplicant.conf is correct because its tested by a other study.
I start the sta0 without an address by ./sta_up.sh and start the
wpa_sup
wel I tried to set different rates (2,5.5,11) but with no success. I
tested to connecte with atheros chiset pcmcia card and ap & key are ok.
Here are the log I had while doing some tests with airport extreme. I
join also the display of the card and iwlist.
Test I had done
ifconfig up eth1
iwconfi
On Friday 06 January 2006 12:38, you wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > How would the virtual interfaces look like? That is quite easy to answer.
> > They are net_devices, as they transfer data.
> > They should probaly _not_ be on top of the ethernet, as 80211 does not
> > have very much in common with et
> > * We really have no wireless maintainer. I'm just the defacto guy,
> > with no interest in the job. The ideal maintainer knows 802.11 well,
> > uses git, and isn't an asshole with no taste. I'm just the guy who
> > wants to make sure the net driver portion doesn't turn out to be a
> >
Forwarded Message
> From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: State of the Union: Wireless
> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:22:18 -0500
>
>
> State of the Union - Wireless
> Januar
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:51 +0100, Marco Minutoli wrote:
> i've WEP working at 54M. i've the 2.6.15-r5 vanilla source get from the
> gentoo repository some weeks ago.
It depends on the hardware. Some hardware doesn't support high rates
yet. WEP IS UNRELATED.
johannes
signature.asc
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 04:25 +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>
>>Just tried to have bcm43xx & softmap orking with an wep encrypted
>>network but it doesn't work yet. I've also see that there is a crypto
>>patch but I can't read
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 04:25 +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Just tried to have bcm43xx & softmap orking with an wep encrypted
> network but it doesn't work yet. I've also see that there is a crypto
> patch but I can't read this patch in archive. Can anyone send me it ?
> Anyway, here the method I
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 19:17 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> It may just be that getting an address takes a long time, but it seems like
> running the 'iwconfig bcm43xx essid virtuousgeek' during the 'ifup' operation
> gets things going.
No, that's needed because it doesn't reassociate if going dow
17 matches
Mail list logo
