On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:06 +0200, Martin Langer wrote:
r13 is new and wasn't available during the good old v3 era.
True. Was r11 even there?
But my version 3 driver contains:
r2-b(g?)
r2-b-bs (g?)
r2-a
r2-a-bs
r2 images are for r4 hardware, too. It's just a different name
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:45:41PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:06 +0200, Martin Langer wrote:
r13 is new and wasn't available during the good old v3 era.
True. Was r11 even there?
r11 is only available from 3.130.x.x and 3.131.x.x. All other v3
drivers don't have
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 18:50 +0200, Martin Langer wrote:
There are initvals 21..25 missing in the table, but fwcutter is already
miles ahead ;) and bcm43xx still doesn't support upload on core
revisions =11. Well, bcm43xx do an upload but choosing wrong files (r5
files instead of r11). ---
On Friday 30 March 2007 21:00, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 18:50 +0200, Martin Langer wrote:
There are initvals 21..25 missing in the table, but fwcutter is already
miles ahead ;) and bcm43xx still doesn't support upload on core
revisions =11. Well, bcm43xx do an upload
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 23:19 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
Ok, what's actually done in the initvals _exactly_?
Does someone have a complete and exact summary?
All I know is that it's stuff dependent on the loaded
microcode and the running core revision.
Well. Saying it exactly would require a
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 23:26 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
Seems sane to me. a reg primitive would be good too, and I don't think
PHY or radio registers are required (not that they hurt).
Oh, of course the shm primitives allow that. How about getting rid of
the current shm primitives again and
On Friday 30 March 2007 23:36, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 23:26 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
Seems sane to me. a reg primitive would be good too, and I don't think
PHY or radio registers are required (not that they hurt).
Oh, of course the shm primitives allow that. How
Since those changes are in the fedora-netdev repo, I downloaded that
kernel* and performance jumped to over 7Mbps to outside testing places.
Wow! Nice job guys!
Thanks for the advice, Larry, and thanks for the hard work from the
development and spec teams!
Ehud
*ok, it wasn't quite that
Ehud Gavron wrote:
Since those changes are in the fedora-netdev repo, I downloaded that
kernel* and performance jumped to over 7Mbps to outside testing places.
Wow! Nice job guys!
Thanks for the advice, Larry, and thanks for the hard work from the
development and spec teams!
Ehud
Just so everyone is aware of how well development is coming along here
is some proof. Larry you have done an awsome job bring the softmac up to
a very usuable standard in todays modern home network!!
Wireless interface testing using Iperf
==
Testing
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Larry Finger wrote:
Also on the FTP site are two Perl scripts for testing. One of them
(perf_test.pl) uses an Iperf
server somewhere on your LAN. The other (file_test.pl) works with an NFS
server on your LAN to
measure transfer rates.
Here is somet testing from me
11 matches
Mail list logo
