On Monday 01 March 2010 00:38:16 Nathan Schulte wrote:
> 2010/2/28 Gábor Stefanik :
> > The latest patch, which is a partial success according to some
> > testers, writes to core 1 (PCI-E) instead of core 0 (ChipCommon).
> Then either I am misinterpreting the logs, or the last patch in this
> threa
2010/2/28 Nathan Schulte :
> 2010/2/28 Gábor Stefanik :
>> OK, this dump shows the 0x280a write happening with core 3, i.e. PCIE,
>> active. So, it is indeed probably the "PCIE misc configuration"
>> routine. Why it's 0x280a is still a mystery to me, it should be 0x100a
>> according to the specs.
>
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:51:14 -0500
William Bourque wrote:
> Chris Vine wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:58:11 +0100
> > Michael Buesch wrote:
> >> It says 8k for all of my devices there. So an MMIO write to 0x2000
> >> and above writes to completely random memory.
> >>
> > My BCM4312 device is 1
Chris Vine wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:58:11 +0100
Michael Buesch wrote:
It says 8k for all of my devices there. So an MMIO write to 0x2000
and above writes to completely random memory.
My BCM4312 device is 16K:
Region 0: Memory at f800 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Now th
On Sunday 28 February 2010 21:30:38 Chris Vine wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:58:11 +0100
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > It says 8k for all of my devices there. So an MMIO write to 0x2000
> > and above writes to completely random memory.
> >
> My BCM4312 device is 16K:
>
> Region 0: Memory at f8
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:58:11 +0100
Michael Buesch wrote:
> It says 8k for all of my devices there. So an MMIO write to 0x2000
> and above writes to completely random memory.
>
My BCM4312 device is 16K:
Region 0: Memory at f800 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Chris
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:44:12 -0500
William Bourque wrote:
> > New test patch attached.
> >
> > Please CC linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org on further e-mails,
> > bcm43xx-dev appears to be having problems.
> >
>
> Hmm... I don't know if it is only coincidence, but this one seems to
> help somehow
New test patch attached.
Please CC linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org on further e-mails,
bcm43xx-dev appears to be having problems.
Hmm... I don't know if it is only coincidence, but this one seems to
help somehow.
The driver raised the DMA error again, but instead of being as soon as I
bro
On Sunday 28 February 2010 19:52:53 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> 2010/2/28 Rafał Miłecki :
> > 2010/2/28 Gábor Stefanik :
> >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, William Bourque
> >> wrote:
> >>> I confirm, it still crashes on my notebook as well. However the new
> >>> "fallback to PIO" behavior introduc
2010/2/28 Rafał Miłecki :
> 2010/2/28 Gábor Stefanik :
>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, William Bourque
>> wrote:
>>> I confirm, it still crashes on my notebook as well. However the new
>>> "fallback to PIO" behavior introduced earlier do a fine job getting it back
>>> on track.
>>>
>>> Btw, yo
2010/2/28 Gábor Stefanik :
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, William Bourque
> wrote:
>> I confirm, it still crashes on my notebook as well. However the new
>> "fallback to PIO" behavior introduced earlier do a fine job getting it back
>> on track.
>>
>> Btw, you are often refering to some docume
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, William Bourque
wrote:
> I confirm, it still crashes on my notebook as well. However the new
> "fallback to PIO" behavior introduced earlier do a fine job getting it back
> on track.
>
> Btw, you are often refering to some documentation that document the register
>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, William Bourque
wrote:
> Chris Vine wrote:
>> This doesn't help on my netbook, I am afraid.
>>
> I confirm, it still crashes on my notebook as well. However the new
> "fallback to PIO" behavior introduced earlier do a fine job getting it back
> on track.
>
> Btw, y
Chris Vine wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:44:58 +0100
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
2010/2/28 Nathan Schulte :
2010/2/27 Gábor Stefanik :
OK, I whipped up a quick test patch with changes found so far
implemented. Please test if this improves the situation.
Where can I find this patch?
-Nate
Oops
2010/2/28 Nathan Schulte :
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Nathan Schulte wrote:
>> 2010/2/27 Larry Finger :
>>> The printk's I sent yesterday can have timing info, but the timestamps
>>> would not
>>> be exactly coordinated - printk values seem to be generated when logged, not
>>> when reques
On Sunday 28 February 2010 02:37:21 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> W dniu 27 lutego 2010 15:51 użytkownik Michael Buesch
> napisał:
> > On Saturday 27 February 2010 12:12:23 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> 2010/2/10 Michael Buesch :
> >> > On Tuesday 09 February 2010 21:04:33 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> >> +#def
Mailing list test, please ignore.
--
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
17 matches
Mail list logo
