Re: [PATCH 0/5] b43: more N-PHY stuff

2010-01-22 Thread David Woodhouse
rather than just davem, but the effect is much the same most of the time. Can you provide a list of existing subscribers? -- David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation

Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix to enhance TX speed

2008-09-08 Thread David Woodhouse
verified any speed improvement, but certainly this patch (when applied on top of the Fedora 9 kernel) doesn't make my shinybook get bus errors, which has been a common problem when updating this part of the code to match the specs. -- David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology

Re: Operation wpa_driver_wext_set_countermeasures not supported

2007-12-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 12:36 +0100, Robert Allerstorfer wrote: done. I have recompiled and replaced the original b43.ko from 'kernel-2.6.23.9-90.fc8.src.rpm', with the modified 'phy.c' [if (B43_DEBUG) changed to if (0) on line 741]. Using Fedora's build mechanism, I had to built the entire

Re: [PATCH] b43: Use input-polldev for the rfkill switch

2007-10-03 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:22 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: This removes the direct call to rfkill on an rfkill event and replaces it with an input device. This way userspace is also notified about the event. Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... static void

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-17 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 23:33 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: These are all false positives, except this one, where the wrong converter function was used. @@ -442,7 +444,7 @@ void b43legacy_rx(struct b43legacy_wldev phystat0 = le16_to_cpu(rxhdr-phy_status0); phystat3 =

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 16:19 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: --- wireless-dev.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.c +++ wireless-dev/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.c @@ -125,10 +125,12 @@ void b43legacy_generate_plcp_hdr(struct __u8 *raw = plcp-raw; if

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 10:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: The only way that b43legacy_rx() could generate a BUG_ON is if the bitrate codes in the received message are messed up. The attached patch will partially silence those messages and let us see more. Perhaps we can find the real cause. I

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:44 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: David, Please try the patch below. Differently buggered... now we hit the B43legacy_BUG_ON() in b43legacy_rx() -- at least that's the _last_ trace I captured from the screen; there were more further up. This device is basically

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:32 +0200, David Woodhouse wrote: This device is basically identical to the one I handed to John in Cambridge last week. How do I force the b43 driver to bind to it? This (and copying b0g0initvals2 from the b43legacy/ directory to b43/) didn't work... it seems it can't

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:56 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: Revisions 5 are not supported by the driver. So there's no way to use this device with v4 firmware any more? -- dwmw2 ___ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 10:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: David Woodhouse wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:44 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: David, Please try the patch below. Differently buggered... now we hit the B43legacy_BUG_ON() in b43legacy_rx() -- at least that's the _last_ trace I

Re: Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 14:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Are you using DMA or PIO? I did find some PIO endian problems, but none with DMA so far. I don't know -- which probably means DMA, right? I don't have 1GiB of RAM (I have precisely 1GiB). -- dwmw2

Machine Check on Fedora rawhide kernel.

2007-09-12 Thread David Woodhouse
Will poke at it more when I get home at the end of the week... Sep 12 08:17:22 shinybook NetworkManager: info starting... Sep 12 08:17:22 shinybook kernel: Machine check in kernel mode. Sep 12 08:17:22 shinybook kernel: Caused by (from SRR1=149030): Transfer error ack signal Sep 12 08:17:22

Re: b43legacy woes

2007-08-31 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 17:26 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: The poor performance of the BCM4306/2 (your chip/card) is known. There has been a report that this is a regression since 2.6.20, or so, has not been confirmed. With a 2.6.21 kernel, I got an iperf transmit rate of 4 Mbs, but that

Re: Which module

2007-08-27 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 10:56 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: You may use either one. The driver supported by mainstream kernels is bcm43xx, which uses SoftMAC as its MAC layer. The driver named b43, which uses mac80211 as its MAC layer, will be replacing bcm43xx in mainstream in the coming

Re: ALERT: firmware change for b43

2007-08-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 14:37 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: It is recommended that you update fwcutter before these patches are merged. If your version of fwcutter was obtained with subversion, a simple 'svn update' in the fwcutter directory will suffice. If you are using a version provided by your

Re: mac80211 IPv6 problems

2007-08-03 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 20:55 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: I hacked-up the (untested) patch below -- thoughts? I tried to test it. Today, I get no connectivity with bcm43xx-mac80211 (from Fedora 7 + your patch). It does manage to associate, but tcpdump shows it doesn't seem to receive any

Re: 4311 works with fedora 7 but only at 1mb/s

2007-08-03 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 10:19 +0300, John H. wrote: So there's no way to use bcm43xx while using an rpm kernel? Yes, of course there is. You just have to add the PCI ID of your own card by echoing it to /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bcm43xx/new_id I just have this in /etc/rc.local: /sbin/modprobe

Re: [RFC 0/10] Port of bcm43xx from softmac to mac80211

2007-08-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:30 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: I was hoping this would be your response, but I had to make the effort. I'll wait for a couple of days to see if anyone else has any comments and send it on to Linville and hope it ends up in -mm fairly soon. It _DOES_ work on the

Re: mac80211 IPv6 problems

2007-08-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:30 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: This may be a stack-level issue. This is one of the issues holding back zd1211rw-mac80211 going into mainline: we have a report that zd1211rw-softmac works fine with IPv6 but mac80211 only works occasionally with the same device on the

Re: [PATCH FINAL] Merge the Sonics Silicon Backplane subsystem

2007-08-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 20:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: Look. Kconfig's `select' Just. Does. Not. Work. If you find yourself contemplating using it, please, don sackcloth, take a cold shower and several analgesics, then have another go, OK? Amen. -- dwmw2

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx-mac80211: Fix specs typo for baseband attenuation

2007-07-27 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 13:49 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: No matter, the change is needed to make some older cards work. Now I know why bcm43xx-mac80211 never worked on my BCM4306 until today. Hm, it has worked for me in the past, and your patch fixes it so it works again (at least as well as it

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix deviation from specifications in set_baseband_attenuation

2007-07-25 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 22:59 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=77548f58070894cf5970a110981e511ffe793369 Commit: 77548f58070894cf5970a110981e511ffe793369 Parent:

Re: bcm4301: A mac80211 driver using V3 firmware

2007-07-20 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 00:43 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: That's a very good goal. I would also consider the option to use different names for v3 and v4 firmware. I have a file /etc/modprobe.d/bcm43xx that reads options bcm43xx fwpostfix=.3 options bcm43xx_mac80211 fwpostfix=.4 but we

Re: Multicast RX and TX both broken

2007-07-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 00:24 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 00:15 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I'm going back to the softmac driver for now. Although I might follow up with a report of the crash which happens when I the remove bcm43xx-mac80211 module. Hm, I'm sure

Re: Multicast RX and TX both broken

2007-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:37 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: On Friday 13 July 2007 01:15:28 David Woodhouse wrote: If I run 'tcpdump -p' to refrain from putting it in promiscuous mode, I don't see the RA packet to 33:33:00:00:00:01. And IPv6 autoconfiguration doesn't work. So, what if you

Re: Multicast RX and TX both broken

2007-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 11:48 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:37 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: On Friday 13 July 2007 01:15:28 David Woodhouse wrote: If I run 'tcpdump -p' to refrain from putting it in promiscuous mode, I don't see the RA packet to 33:33:00:00:00:01

Multicast RX and TX both broken

2007-07-12 Thread David Woodhouse
Multicast receive is not working in bcm43xx-mac80211 (BCM4306 on PowerBook G4); Fedora rawhide's 2.6.22-rc7-git3 kernel. When I bring up the interface, tcpdump shows me these packets... 00:00:42.937394 00:0a:95:f3:99:92 33:33:ff:f3:99:92, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 78: ::

Re: Multicast RX and TX both broken

2007-07-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 00:15 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I'm going back to the softmac driver for now. Although I might follow up with a report of the crash which happens when I the remove bcm43xx-mac80211 module. Hm, I'm sure it locked the entire machine last time, but this time when I did

Re: F7 with newer kernel

2007-06-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 13:30 -0700, Ehud Gavron wrote: # cd /usr/src # git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git # ln wireless-dev linux # cd /usr/src/linux # cp /usr/src/kernels/2.6.21-1.3228.fc7-x86_64/.config ./.config # make clean # make

Re: IPV6 autoconf problems

2007-05-25 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 19:51 +0200, Andrea Lusuardi - UoVoBW wrote: May 18 16:08:24 electricmove kernel: wlan0: duplicate address detected! May 18 16:10:19 electricmove kernel: wlan0: duplicate address detected! May 18 16:11:45 electricmove kernel: wlan0: duplicate address detected! -a lot of

Re: IPV6 autoconf problems

2007-05-25 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 20:13 +0100, Steve Hill wrote: On Fri, 25 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote: I'd like to have packet dumps of the master interface, a monitor interface and the actual interface that has the problem simultaneously, http://www.nexusuk.org/~steve/iwl3945-ipv6/ap.pcap

Re: IPV6 autoconf problems

2007-05-22 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 09:08 +0200, Andrea Lusuardi - UoVoBW wrote: The debian config of radvd was quite simple and yes, this is true.I set this up on my access point and it behaved as you described. How can this be fixed? Well, I'd start by showing the main developers how to reproduce it :)

Re: IPV6 autoconf problems

2007-05-22 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 20:38 +0200, Andrea Lusuardi - UoVoBW wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2007 08:32:11 -0400 David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you can test it at a time the network is otherwise fairly idle, and just bring your bcm43xx up with 'ip link set eth1 up' rather than

Re: IPV6 autoconf problems

2007-05-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 19:51 +0200, Andrea Lusuardi - UoVoBW wrote: but that makes no difference. Any help would be highly appreciated, and i have no problem providing more debug - once i know what to write - or even ssh access to my laptop - ibook g4 with a bcm4306 card, I've seen the

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx-mac80211: Fix machine checks on PPC with rev 1 PHYs

2007-04-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:17 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: With phy rev == 1, the gmode bit is assumed unset when initialising a G PHY. Maybe that is the crucial difference. David will send me some backtraces of this problem, once he does I'll look at it again.

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx-mac80211: Fix machine checks on PPC with rev 1 PHYs

2007-04-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 01:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:17 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: With phy rev == 1, the gmode bit is assumed unset when initialising a G PHY. Maybe that is the crucial difference. David will send me some backtraces of this problem, once he

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx-mac80211: Fix machine checks on PPC with rev 1 PHYs

2007-04-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 20:22 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Your tester needs to get a copy of David's hack that prints out the address of the offending register. That is the only way to tell what is happening. Once we know the address, then it will be a matter of getting printk's into the

Re: Machine checks with bcm43xx-mac80211

2007-04-11 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:13 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: David Woodhouse wrote: I figured if people were going to start working more on the mac80211 driver than the softmac one, I probably ought to start reporting the cases where it kills my machine. So I hacked up ssb_pci_{read,write}16

Machine checks with bcm43xx-mac80211

2007-04-10 Thread David Woodhouse
I figured if people were going to start working more on the mac80211 driver than the softmac one, I probably ought to start reporting the cases where it kills my machine. So I hacked up ssb_pci_{read,write}16 to use outw instead of readw and thus get their machine checks trapped. This is what I

Re: Machine checks with bcm43xx-mac80211

2007-04-10 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:19 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote: I figured if people were going to start working more on the mac80211 driver than the softmac one, I probably ought to start reporting the cases where it kills my machine. So I hacked up ssb_pci_{read,write}16 to use outw instead

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:18 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: I have started a project to build an out-of-tree version of bcm43xx, but it isn't ready for prime time. 'cp -r drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx ~/bcm43xx-for-hacking-on' usually works for me. Then it's just $ cd ~/bcm43xx-for-hacking-on $

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-08 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 11:17 -0500, John H. wrote: I was looking for some binary solution for now, as my fedora kernel is Linux laptop 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 #1 SMP Mon Mar 19 11:38:26 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And I have stopped compiling own kernels due to lack of time. Why would you

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Change initialization for 2050 radios

2007-03-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 11:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: This patch implements the changes in the specifications for 2050radio_init that were recently posted. That seems to help performance quite a lot -- although 'rate 11M' still runs a _lot_ faster than the 24M which the driver seems to settle

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Change initialization for 2050 radios

2007-03-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 12:57 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Is the better performance for 11M in transmitting or receiving? How is it measured? My 4306's, which should be the same as yours, do better at 24M than at 11M. It's for 'scp somekernelrpm shinybook:' -- it's not a particularly good test.

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Change initialization for 2050 radios

2007-03-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:11 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: OK, you are measuring receive speed, which is nearly independent of Bit Rate. Do you have access to any other host on your LAN that could be an Iperf server, or that is an NFS server? That can be done. Need to get Fedora PS3 kernel

Re: Machine checks on PPC with phy-rev == 1

2007-03-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 09:17 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: I have been working off-line with David Woodhouse and Pavel Roskin to sort out machine checks on PPC hardware with a phy-rev == 1 card. As you likely recall, we submitted a patch that fixed two distinct places in the code. One of them

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix machine check on PPC for version 1 PHY

2007-03-26 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 21:33 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Joseph has fixed the problem in initb5 (the first hunk), but the second hunk is still not in the new specs. It was in the previous version in a slightly different form, but was found largely by trial and error. I would prefer that

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:53 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: FWIW, by inspection it looks like the mac80211-based driver is (trying?) to implement this change. David, have you tried the mac80211 version? Does it still have the same crash? Should the one in 2.6.20-1.2982.fc7 be OK? I can

Re: 4306 of PowerPC: machine check in ssb_pci_read16

2007-02-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:22 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: I've got my hands on a 4306 MiniPCI card, and I put it into a BlueWhite G3 PowerMac though a MiniPCI to PCI adapter. I tried the current code from wireless-dev.git. The softmac bcm43xx driver would load. The scanning works, but the

[2.6.20 PATCH] Fix work_struct fallout in ieee80211softmac

2006-12-19 Thread David Woodhouse
Change non-work invocations of ieee80211softmac_assoc_work() to use 'mac-associnfo.work.work' instead of just passing the 'mac' structure directly. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c b/net/ieee80211/softmac

Re: ibook issues

2006-11-24 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 19:29 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: Using kernel version 2.6.17, bcm43xx-fwcutter version 20060501 Upgrade the kernel. We can only support current stable kernel. Well, with the exception that I still know of at least one Fedora user whose bcm43xx works fine with the

Re: Associate on 'ifconfig up'

2006-05-10 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 15:06 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: On Saturday 06 May 2006 20:24, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 17:38 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I still need this hack to work around the fact that softmac doesn't attempt to associate when we bring the device up

Re: link status and association

2006-04-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 11:06 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: iirc you -always- had to mount the interface *before* associating. When you modprobe the module the radio is turned off, mounting the interface does enable the radio. dmesg outputs are pretty clear on it: Yes, that's a bug. I fixed

Re: System Lockup

2006-04-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 01:43 -0800, Christopher Stone wrote: I tried the bcm43xx drivers that come with Fedora Core 5, however my system totally freezes and locks up when I modprobe bcm43xx Precisely which kernel version? The one which came with FC5, or the current updated kernel? -- dwmw2

Re: No NetworkManager

2006-03-30 Thread David Woodhouse
-hack.patch --- [SOFTMAC] Send WEXT assoc/disassoc events to userspace For whatever reason, softmac is sending custom events to userspace already, but it should _really_ be sending the right WEXT events instead. Signed-off-by: Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse [EMAIL

Re: softmac interface naming

2006-03-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 02:11 -0500, Simon wrote: Are there any plans to change softmac so that wireless interfaces aren't tr= eated as wired interfaces?br Don't send HTML to public fora. The question doesn't make much sense. With the current code, I treat mine as a wireless interface -- surely

Re: softmac interface naming

2006-03-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 08:46 -0600, Timothee Besset wrote: Worse than naming the wireless interface eth%d, it also calls it eth0 or eth1 randomly on my machine. That's reason enough to force a specific name for me. Simon, check this thread in the forums:

Re: Starter guide needed

2006-03-25 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 22:10 -0500, Robert Wilkens wrote: Can someone point me towards any documentation on how to get started with the driver? (No hurry) I've been trying to get the bcm43xx standalone driver to work (Dell Wireless 1450 card), and have been having some issues. This is on

[PATCH] Avoid lockup with -set_channel() on card when it's down.

2006-03-24 Thread David Woodhouse
If the device is taken down during a scan, the bcm43xx driver can lock up the system the next time -set_channel() is called. This avoids the lockup by checking whether the card is running before poking at it. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.16.ppc/drivers/net

Re: Default to 11Mbps.

2006-03-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 08:11 -0700, Hans Fugal wrote: I had difficulty associating with the same sequence of commands when put in a script as opposed to doing it by hand. A well-placed 1-second sleep did wonders. Interesting. Precisely where in your script did you need the sleep? Is it still

Re: Default to 11Mbps.

2006-03-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 09:42 -0700, Hans Fugal wrote: See http://www.mail-archive.com/bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de/msg00789.html The first 10-second sleep is the vital one, but 10 seconds is much too long for that as I have done it much faster than that by hand and it worked. That could

Re: Default to 11Mbps.

2006-03-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 09:42 -0700, Hans Fugal wrote: See http://www.mail-archive.com/bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de/msg00789.html The first 10-second sleep is the vital one, but 10 seconds is much oo long for that as I have done it much faster than that by hand and it worked. Works for

Reduce scan dwell time.

2006-03-22 Thread David Woodhouse
Even with the patch I sent last night, I still get outages of about 8 seconds when I scan. There's no need for us to be dwelling for half a second on every channel; this changes it to 20ms instead. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.16.ppc/net/ieee80211/softmac

Associate on 'ifconfig up'

2006-03-22 Thread David Woodhouse
fixed this for suspend/resume; this just moves the same hack into bcm43xx_init_board() so it happens on 'ifconfig up' and reset too. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.16.ppc/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c~ 2006-03-21 23:50:00.0 +

Scan forces deassociation

2006-03-21 Thread David Woodhouse
After a scan, bcm43xx doesn't seem to switch back to the correct frequency. I have to set the ESSID again to prevent it from falling off the network. -- dwmw2 ___ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Link LED not working on cardbus Linksys WPC54G

2006-02-07 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:50 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: I wonder where Fedora is getting their source. The iwconfig errors you report were fixed about a month ago. On my system, WPA started working on Jan. 12 and that didn't work until most of the IOCTL links used by iwconfig were working.

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Link LED not working on cardbus Linksys WPC54G

2006-02-07 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 15:31 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: I'm not quite sure where the patches are. The subversion tree is a lot newer than the FC sources seem to be, but not current. Michael Buesch has a private git tree, but I not comfortable giving you that URL. If he is willing to publish it,

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Re: [GIT PULL] bcm43xx: Update B6PHY initialization

2006-02-03 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 19:15 +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: If somebody relied on that for filtering, please use the List-Id or X-BeenThere headers instead. It's actually more reliable to use the SMTP reverse-path, which is often seen in a Return-Path: header if it isn't available directly. If in

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Success report from PowerBook5,4

2006-01-06 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:53 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: No, that's needed because it doesn't reassociate if going down and up again. Will that be fixed at some point, or should I modify my scripts to do it automatically? It'll get fixed in the end, yes. At all times while the device is up

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Reassociate after resume.

2006-01-04 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 10:43 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Does that restore things like selected rate, essid, etc... ? We do lose those with ifdown/ifup ... I haven't had to select a rate. I do have to manually set the essid when I bring the device up because otherwise it refuses to

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Multicast/broadcast RX

2006-01-03 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:54 +, David Woodhouse wrote: Sticking the device into promiscuous mode works around this, but it obviously isn't ideal. The MAC filtering isn't yet sufficiently documented for us to do any better. though. We shouldn't printk when we drop unwanted packets

[Bcm43xx-dev] Reassociate after resume.

2006-01-03 Thread David Woodhouse
This isn't the right answer, but it's a hack which makes it reassociate after resume. Really, we should implement suspend/resume methods in softmac itself. --- linux-2.6.15/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c~ 2006-01-03 22:56:55.0 + +++

[Bcm43xx-dev] Device table

2006-01-03 Thread David Woodhouse
This adds a device table to the bcm43xx module so that it gets automatically loaded by hotplug. --- linux/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c~ 2006-01-03 04:35:26.0 + +++ linux/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c 2006-01-03 04:35:29.0 + @@ -139,6

[Bcm43xx-dev] SIOCGWAP

2006-01-02 Thread David Woodhouse
The GNOME NetworkManager tool depends on SIOCGWAP to tell when it's associated. --- drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_wx.c~ 2006-01-02 18:34:29.0 + +++ drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_wx.c 2006-01-02 18:31:11.0 + @@ -346,8 +346,19 @@ static int

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] SIOCGWAP

2006-01-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 20:30 +0100, Danny van Dyk wrote: Already part of softmac... Checkout latest driver (r1020) and softmac (218) sources... Heh, thanks. It can wait until tomorrow's snapshot -- I don't need any more gratuitously different version control systems this week :) It would be a

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Multicast/broadcast RX

2006-01-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 01:38 +, David Woodhouse wrote: It's not just multicast reception that isn't working -- I don't receive broadcast packets either. Sticking the device into promiscuous mode works around this, but it obviously isn't ideal. The MAC filtering isn't yet sufficiently

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] handle_irq_transmit_status() never called on iBook, Airport Extreme

2006-01-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 08:54 -0600, Matteo Frigo wrote: I would appreciate if other people could confirm whether handle_irq_transmit_status() is called on their system, so that I can try to further diagnose the problem. It's not being called here -- I see precisely the same as you. It stops

Re: [Bcm43xx-dev] Test report.

2005-12-31 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 02:37 +, David Woodhouse wrote: At that point I can use dhclient successfully and Legacy IP works. Hm, almost. If I leave a ping running, I see an occasional TX timeout, followed by a reset -- and then I have to manually set the ESSID again before it'll work any more

[Bcm43xx-dev] Test report.

2005-12-30 Thread David Woodhouse
I've just tried the current (20051230) snapshot on the 2.6.15-rc7-git4 (Fedora Rawhide) kernel on a PowerBook. I also used the patch from http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=113591302004639w=2 The resulting kernel package (which also installs on FC4 with --nodeps) is at