I'm new to this list ~ greetings all round,
I've been
following the thread on the above card for a few days now -- as luck (or
misfortune) would have it, I bought a number of these cards a couple of weeks
agoI live in Australi
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:04:42 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
>
> 2008/3/19, kala mazoo :
>> .but, I dunno for sure...yet
ribing patches needing to be included in various places - is this still the
case?
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 05:37:18 kala mazoo wrote:
>> The kernel shipped with the deb3 release [linux-2.6.18-4-686]
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:18:02 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 2.6.18 doesn't support 4318. Try 2.6.22 or 2.6.23 if you want proper
> funct
you are saying is that I'll need hostapd even for that?
Regards,
Donald
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:03 AM, kala mazoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Date
G'day Larry. thanks for your imput here,
> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:10:16 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
Greetings again,
and the plot thickens
.I was already thinking like Larry's posting, about how much I could
actually trust this so called 'softAP' mode of the XP - asus driver&management
suite, so probably right about the time Larry was typing that down, I'd
concluded to buy a
> Subject: RE: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:31:23 +0100
>
>
>> ...I'd be fairly sure that I shouldn't see this either ;
>>
>> wlan0: authenticate wi
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:04:09 +0100
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sunday 23 March 2008 14:58:08 kala m
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:17:06 +0100
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
>
> On Sunday 23 March 2008 15:1
> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:08:46 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: More on ASUS WL-138G V2
> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:37:51 +0100
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sunday 23 March 2008 15:53:27 kala mazoo wrote:
>> ...
>
> Are you running on x86_64?
> Can you try booting without IOMMU support?
> I think it's the commanline option iommu=0 or iommu=off or something like
> that.
>
> The driver does not work on x86_64 with IOMMU. That's because the IOMMU
> code is broken. (not a b43 bug)
>
> --
Hi Michael,
Greets,
Although this will never be the point, I jammed one of these
cards into
a 32bit machine here (Via EPIA-TC) running linux-2.6.20 and using the bcm43xx
driver codeand it would appear to be working.
//associate with AP, WEP only. key=open//
=
Greets,
As conjecture has been raised over how much of this might
be architecture related, versus how much of it is the card's fault, I've
done a few hours checking on both 32 & 64 bit machines here, and
this is what I have found ;
32bitbcm43xxlinux-2.6.20 working
> Stefanik G?bor wrote:
> Also, what radio is WL-138G V2 using? Is it the same radio as other
> 4318/02 cards? Someone with a broken WL-138G V2 should check.
> (With a broken one, since you need to remove the radio's cover.)
I sent Larry the card, so this info should be good for his example as
Greets,
Following up on this idea of substituting sprom images;
> Oops, sorry, here is the attached SPROM file.>
>
>On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Stefanik Gábor
>wrote:
>
> Looks like this is an Asus-specific issue. Can you try flashing the
> attached SPROM file (with
Greets,
I'd originally downloaded ssb_sprom from the git link on the b43
page.
Initially the syntax / usage of ssb_sprom totally eluded me, so I went back and
searched the mailling list for clues.
It was there that I found a posting by Larry, being a patch for the README
file of th
Greets,
Still using my 32bit machine fitted with this card and finding
a couple of strange quirks. Current 'state of play' on this machine is
as follows;
linux-2.6.25
compat-wireless-2008-04-20 + Michael's patch series 'mb-wl-20080420-1630'
rewrote original ssb_sprom image back
> Subject: Re: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:24:16 +0200
>
>
>> Notice the lack of led devices registering here (as I mentione
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:26:34 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Johannes Berg <[E
> Subject: RE: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:42:45 +0200
>
>
> So let me get this straight, you have (topo
Greets,
I've spent the last too many hours trying to recreate
exactly what I'd done on the 32bit machine, on this box - an
AMD/x2 64bit unit. The software instance installed is a
'pure_64bit' type with no 32bit compat at all. The board is
using the nvidia CK804 chipset.
Forgetting
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:14:11 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2 on x86_64
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:56 AM, kala mazoo wrote:
>>
<>
>>
>> A
Greets,
Apologies for previous noise about 2.6.24 ooopsing. It wasn't
relevant..
As queried, I grabbed the (then) latest wireless-testing tree, and that
compiled &
loaded modules without the noted errors. The asus card worked, although in this
case the rx/tx LED remains off the e
Greets,
> Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 22:33:52 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: ASUS WL-138G v2 / 64bit x86 / b43 working much better
>
>
<>
>
>> SPROM(0x64, LED 0 behaviour) = 0xFF
>> SPRO
> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 22:18:32 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>
Apparently there's more than just these bits in the sprom controlling the
LED
behaviour? Does anyone know what that might be?
>>> I'm not sure what you should expect from
27 matches
Mail list logo
