On Thursday 11 September 2008 05:37:48 Larry Finger wrote:
> Lorenzo Nava wrote:
> >> I'm not a reverse engineer, so I have no chance to check the original
> >> code to agree (or not) with you.
> >>
> > Ok, the mail has Johannes in Cc. I hope that he can tell me if me and
> > Francesco are right
Lorenzo Nava wrote:
>> I'm not a reverse engineer, so I have no chance to check the original
>> code to agree (or not) with you.
>>
> Ok, the mail has Johannes in Cc. I hope that he can tell me if me and
> Francesco are right or not.
> Johannes please check it (I mean specs at
> http://bcm-v4.si
>
> I'm not a reverse engineer, so I have no chance to check the original
> code to agree (or not) with you.
>
Ok, the mail has Johannes in Cc. I hope that he can tell me if me and
Francesco are right or not.
Johannes please check it (I mean specs at
http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/QoS)
,
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 22:11:53 Lorenzo Nava wrote:
> >>
> > The code is correct wrt specs. It says there are 0x16 words.
> > First fix specs, then fix code, please.
> >
> Yes you're right, but just above the table of the parameters reported
> at http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/QoS
>>
> The code is correct wrt specs. It says there are 0x16 words.
> First fix specs, then fix code, please.
>
Yes you're right, but just above the table of the parameters reported
at http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/QoS it says:
The EDCF Q Info array in SHM contains four structs of 16 16-bi
Stay on list.
I'm not going to start another private thread for this.
In general, I avoid private threads most of the time and
barely answer them. There are so many people on the list
that can answer your questions.
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 17:50:33 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
> > The code is
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 15:18:07 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> we are collecting every kind of material about Broadcom board, too.
> Could you please point out the document with such specifications?
http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/QoS
> I confirm what Lorenzo wrote:
Hi Michael,
we are collecting every kind of material about Broadcom board, too.
Could you please point out the document with such specifications?
I confirm what Lorenzo wrote: there are 32 bytes for queue. If you
leave 22 then all the Qos mechanisms go wrong. Indeed, the bcm board
takes (qu
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 00:15:14 Lorenzo Nava wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I worked with the QoS parameters trying to understand why, checking
> them within the firmware, they don't seems to have the correct values
> even if they were set correctly by the driver.
> I think that there coul
Hi everybody,
I worked with the QoS parameters trying to understand why, checking
them within the firmware, they don't seems to have the correct values
even if they were set correctly by the driver.
I think that there could be an error in the b43.h file:
/* SHM offsets to the QOS data structu
This fixes the initialization of the default QoS parameters.
This got broken by 0b57664cf2393bc1eff594ff7e5ff26533843fe6
Reported-by: Lorenzo Nava
Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
John, please queue for the next merge window, as I'm not interested
in finding explanations for
11 matches
Mail list logo
