> The loss of connection and the low data rate may both be due to
> interference. The bcm43xx driver would be more susceptible than would
> ndiswrapper (see below). Have you tried changing channels? The obvious
> choices would be 1, 6, or 11 depending on other AP's in your vicinity.
> In my cas
Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>
> The sluggishness disappeared with rate 11M. It was at 24M like you
> assumed. But the connection is still lost after a few minutes. It then
> takes a minute before it automatically (most of the time) reconnects.
>
> As I see it, there are two shortcomings of the driver
> I also get the unexplained printk suppressed messages that I don't
> understand.
They may be this (debugging enabled):
bcm43xx: set security called, .level = 0, .enabled = 0, .encrypt = 0
> I also do not understand the sluggish performance from your BCM4312. I
> though it had the same radio
Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have more to report today. I was able to connect to the network now,
> but the connection is sluggish at least with WPA, and eventually
> disconnects. I am getting a lot of the following messages:
>
> [ 477.704000] printk: 2 messages suppressed.
> [ 484.516000
Larry Finger wrote:
> Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>> Larry Finger wrote:
>>> Andrew J. Barr wrote:
Larry Finger wrote:
> I just loaded a new version of the standalone system. Please get it
> and retry your build. I think I fixed the problem.
It works as long as you uncomment _both_
Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> Larry Finger wrote:
>> Andrew J. Barr wrote:
>>> Larry Finger wrote:
I just loaded a new version of the standalone system. Please get it
and retry your build. I think I fixed the problem.
>>>
>>> It works as long as you uncomment _both_ DEBUG and PIO_MODE in
>>> b
Larry Finger wrote:
> Andrew J. Barr wrote:
>> Larry Finger wrote:
>>> I just loaded a new version of the standalone system. Please get it
>>> and retry your build. I think I fixed the problem.
>>
>> It works as long as you uncomment _both_ DEBUG and PIO_MODE in
>> bcm43xx-softmac-sa/bcm43xx/Make
Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> Larry Finger wrote:
>> I just loaded a new version of the standalone system. Please get it
>> and retry your build. I think I fixed the problem.
>
> It works as long as you uncomment _both_ DEBUG and PIO_MODE in
> bcm43xx-softmac-sa/bcm43xx/Makefile.
Thanks for the feedb
Larry Finger wrote:
> Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>>
>> Pavel Roskin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 20:57 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>>>
If I get the chance to roll a custom kernel, I will test it and get
back to you. My network quota is rather restricted where I am
currently,
so i
Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> Larry Finger wrote:
>> For any version of the bcm43xx devices, maximum performance is
>> obtained only by downloading and installing the appropriate patch from
>> ftp://lwfinger.dynalias.org/patches for any kernel through 2.6.21-rc7.
>> It is expected that 2.6.22-rc1 (whe
Larry Finger wrote:
> I just loaded a new version of the standalone system. Please get it and retry
> your build. I think I
> fixed the problem.
It works as long as you uncomment _both_ DEBUG and PIO_MODE in
bcm43xx-softmac-sa/bcm43xx/Makefile.
Thanks!
Andrew
_
Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>
> And the module still fails to load as above. Want me to test more?
I just loaded a new version of the standalone system. Please get it and retry
your build. I think I
fixed the problem.
Larry
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm
Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 20:57 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>>
>>> If I get the chance to roll a custom kernel, I will test it and get
>>> back
>>> to you. My network quota is rather restricted where I am currently,
>>> so
>>> it might take a while to
Larry Finger wrote:
> For any version of the bcm43xx devices, maximum performance is obtained only
> by downloading and
> installing the appropriate patch from ftp://lwfinger.dynalias.org/patches for
> any kernel through
> 2.6.21-rc7. It is expected that 2.6.22-rc1 (when it is released) will ha
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 20:57 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>
>> If I get the chance to roll a custom kernel, I will test it and get
>> back
>> to you. My network quota is rather restricted where I am currently,
>> so
>> it might take a while to get all the packages.
>>
>> Ot
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 20:57 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> If I get the chance to roll a custom kernel, I will test it and get
> back
> to you. My network quota is rather restricted where I am currently,
> so
> it might take a while to get all the packages.
>
> Otherwise I will just give it anot
Larry Finger wrote:
> Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>> Pavel Roskin wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:49 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>>>
referring to the page on http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/?go=devices, here
is my integrated card on a HP Compaq nx6325. So far, I have had no
l
Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:49 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>>
>>> referring to the page on http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/?go=devices, here is
>>> my integrated card on a HP Compaq nx6325. So far, I have had no luck
>>> with the bcm43xx driver, b
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:49 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>
>> referring to the page on http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/?go=devices, here is
>> my integrated card on a HP Compaq nx6325. So far, I have had no luck
>> with the bcm43xx driver, but ndiswrapper works.
>>
>>
Hello!
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:49 +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> referring to the page on http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/?go=devices, here is
> my integrated card on a HP Compaq nx6325. So far, I have had no luck
> with the bcm43xx driver, but ndiswrapper works.
>
> 30:00.0 0280: 14e4:4312 (rev 01)
Dear mailinglist,
referring to the page on http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/?go=devices, here is
my integrated card on a HP Compaq nx6325. So far, I have had no luck
with the bcm43xx driver, but ndiswrapper works.
30:00.0 0280: 14e4:4312 (rev 01)
Subsystem: 103c:1361
Flags: bus maste
21 matches
Mail list logo
