> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:14:11 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2 on x86_64
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:56 AM, kala mazoo wrote:
>>
<>
>>
>> A
Donald,
kala mazoo wrote:
> Greets,
> I've spent the last too many hours trying to recreate
> exactly what I'd done on the 32bit machine, on this box - an
> AMD/x2 64bit unit. The software instance installed is a
> 'pure_64bit' type with no 32bit compat at all. The board is
> using
Greets,
I've spent the last too many hours trying to recreate
exactly what I'd done on the 32bit machine, on this box - an
AMD/x2 64bit unit. The software instance installed is a
'pure_64bit' type with no 32bit compat at all. The board is
using the nvidia CK804 chipset.
Forgetting
> > And the ping is from "this box" to the workstation, so the wr-602 isn't
> > involved?
>
> You know, I did ask myself 'I wonder if he wants a little ascii topo-map?'
> Obviously I got my own answer wrong. Again...
Heh.
> You nearly got it right thoughI'll just move what you've drawn arou
> Subject: RE: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:42:45 +0200
>
>
> So let me get
> Answering your question -- the remote end consists of the netgear wgr-614
> AP unit ; it's WAN port connected to ADSL modem, and one workstation
> connected to it's inbuilt 4-port hub. This is about 10metres down the hall
> from my location.
>
> This end consists of the netgear wr-602 unit in
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:26:34 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 200
> Subject: Re: Feedback on ASUS WL-138G V2
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:24:16 +0200
>
>
>> Notice the lack of led dev
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:26:34 Stefanik Gábor wrote:
> And as we can expect from ASUS, the LED settings are wrong, too. (All are @
> 0xFF.) The same is true for the antenna bitfields (it has 1 antenna for B/G,
> and no A antennas, yet the bitfield says 0 B/G antennas and 2 A ones...).
Well, the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Notice the lack of led devices registering here (as I mentioned before).
> Indeed,
> > the behaviour of the leds is totally different -- now, they come ON and
> stay
> > ON when the card is 'active'...ie; ifconfig wlan
> Notice the lack of led devices registering here (as I mentioned before).
> Indeed,
> the behaviour of the leds is totally different -- now, they come ON and stay
> ON when the card is 'active'...ie; ifconfig wlan0 up. Converse is true ; doing
> 'ifconfig wlan0 down' turns the leds off again.
>
Greets,
Still using my 32bit machine fitted with this card and finding
a couple of strange quirks. Current 'state of play' on this machine is
as follows;
linux-2.6.25
compat-wireless-2008-04-20 + Michael's patch series 'mb-wl-20080420-1630'
rewrote original ssb_sprom image back
12 matches
Mail list logo
