Re: [beagleboard] TI Processor SDK Linux compatibility?

Also note the TI SDK 06_01_00_08 is based on Linux kernel 4.19, whereas the "stable" BBAI debian kernel is based on 4.14. On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 6:01:09 AM UTC-4, Geza Kuhmann wrote: > > > I'm trying to use the latest Linux Processor SDK for AM57x from here >

[beagleboard] Re: BB AI task blocked

disables this message. On Friday, October 25, 2019 at 11:13:02 AM UTC-4, Andrew Elder wrote: > > I see > > [ 242.657917] INFO: task kworker/0:0:3 blocked for more than 120 seconds. > [ 242.665199] Tainted: GW O4.14.108-ti-rt-r122 #1 > [ 242.673861] "echo

Re: [beagleboard] realtime kernel

This looks similar to what I see. On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:17:14 AM UTC-4, Bas de Bruijn wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 9:23:16 PM UTC+2, RobertCNelson wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 2:03 PM Bas de Bruijn >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I received my BB

[beagleboard] Re: BB AI task blocked

debian@beaglebone:/opt/scripts/tools$ uname -a Linux beaglebone 4.14.108-ti-r113 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 31 00:01:10 UTC 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux Does not seem to have the same issue. On Friday, October 25, 2019 at 11:13:02 AM UTC-4, Andrew Elder wrote: > > I see > > [ 242.657917

[beagleboard] BB AI task blocked

I see [ 242.657917] INFO: task kworker/0:0:3 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 242.665199] Tainted: GW O4.14.108-ti-rt-r122 #1 [ 242.673861] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 242.683700] INFO: task kworker/u4:0:5 blocked for more

[beagleboard] Re: How to use "reserved-memory" in device tree to reserve DDR memory?

Would these steps be expected to work with 4.4.30-ti-r64 ? On Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-5, dehgha...@gmail.com wrote: > > OK. I had made a mistake. Your suggestion solved the problem. Now I have a > gap in System RAM. > This is the device tree source that i have used and is

[beagleboard] mainline vs beagleboard Linux

Hi All, What is the philosophy behind maintaining a separate git tree here https://github.com/beagleboard/linux vs having all required software/driver support part of mainline Linux? I can't seem to find a reference to the thinking and/or processes. Best regards, Andrew -- For more options,

Re: [beagleboard] Beaglebone Black add Fiber Interface (SFP)

I would think about adding an Ethernet switch chip. Marvell have several that should work. On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 9:14 AM Thomas Remmert wrote: > Very interested in this also! I did some looking, and cant seem to > find anything that might work... Hopefully others have some thoughts. > > > On