[beagleboard] Need armhf java 8

2021-04-16 Thread maxmike
It looks like the Oracle download page for this archive version is under repairs (for who knows how long) does anybody have a copy of jdk-8u191-linux-arm32-vfp-hflt.tar.gz ? Please? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are

Re: [beagleboard] Debian 10 apt-get failures

2020-12-16 Thread maxmike
Thank you! On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 at 12:34:50 PM UTC-8 jonn...@gmail.com wrote: > Can you ping google.com? > Ex: >ping google.com > > If this fails, then you have a network config issue. > > Cheers, > > Jon > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:1

[beagleboard] Debian 10 apt-get failures

2020-12-16 Thread maxmike
# uname -a Linux beaglebone 4.19.94-ti-r42 #1buster SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 31 19:38:29 UTC 2020 armv7l GNU/Linux # apt-get install pciutils Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: pciutils 0 upgraded,

[beagleboard] Re: Using Debian10 TP-Link TL-WN722n (v2) and rtl8188eu driver, but stuck in staging

2020-12-14 Thread maxmike
CONFIG_PLATFORM_ARM_RTD299X = n CONFIG_PLATFORM_ARM_SPREADTRUM_6820 = n CONFIG_PLATFORM_ARM_SPREADTRUM_8810 = n On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 10:26:13 AM UTC-8 maxmike wrote: > uname: > Linux beaglebone 4.19.94-ti-r42 #1buster SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 31 19:38:29 > UTC 2020 armv7 > I installed driv

[beagleboard] Using TP-Link TL-WN722n (v2) and rtl8188eu driver, but stuck in staging

2020-12-14 Thread maxmike
uname: Linux beaglebone 4.19.94-ti-r42 #1buster SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 31 19:38:29 UTC 2020 armv7 I installed driver per usual scripts, but have no .ko for it, only: /usr/src/linux-headers-4.19.94-ti-r42/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu /lib/modules/4.19.94-ti-r42/kernel/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu I have

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
Thanks Robert - got it. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
Then why is /sys/class/gpio unusable when it was useable in 2017? Just wondering... -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
/sys/class/gpio in root@beaglebone:~# uname -a Linux beaglebone 4.19.94-ti-r42 #1buster SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 31 19:38:29 UTC 2020 armv7l GNU/Linux looks almost identical but is unusable -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
It was using /sys/class/gpio for all gpio's On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 10:28:24 AM UTC-7, maxmike wrote: > > root@niihau:~# uname -a > Linux niihau 3.8.13-bone84 #1 SMP Sun Feb 12 02:54:13 UTC 2017 armv7l > GNU/Linux > > > On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 9:56:10 AM UTC-7

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
root@niihau:~# uname -a Linux niihau 3.8.13-bone84 #1 SMP Sun Feb 12 02:54:13 UTC 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 9:56:10 AM UTC-7, RobertCNelson wrote: > > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:49 AM maxmike > > wrote: > > > > Is that the right thing

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
Is that the right thing to do to freeze the code? Or is there a chance of a mod at your end and I hold off? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
Yes, now I know how to modify my code to verify this - the gpios are split between those two directories in Debian10 -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-08 Thread maxmike
I have a feeling (need to change a bunch of code to check) that gpio5 is at: /sys/devices/platform/ocp/44e07000.gpio/gpiochip0/gpio/gpio5 -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-07 Thread maxmike
There is a hangup when trying gpio 5 (p9.17) : config-pin for it works, but /sys/devices/platform/ocp/4804c000.gpio/gpiochip1/gpio/gpio5/ does not exist -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-07 Thread maxmike
This seems to do the trick: /sys/devices/platform/ocp/4804c000.gpio/gpiochip1/gpio/ but I'm not 100% done. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-07 Thread maxmike
I was hopeful to return here after weaving my system together and thank @rcn for all his help, but I'm not out of the woods yet. All the pins initialize correctly (even 8.13 pwm, which is now in a new file) but as soon as I write the value 47 into /sys/class/gpio/export pin 8.15 disappears

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-02 Thread maxmike
Hm, gpioinfo was not listing p8.15, so just before throwing the board out the window I decided to reboot, and now we seem to be good. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-02 Thread maxmike
On Saturday, May 2, 2020 at 9:30:05 AM UTC-7, maxmike wrote: > > My image is : BeagleBoard.org Debian Buster IoT Image 2020-04-06 > > On Saturday, May 2, 2020 at 9:20:30 AM UTC-7, maxmike wrote: >> >> I get this: >> >> root@beaglebone:/# >> /opt/source/

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-02 Thread maxmike
My image is : BeagleBoard.org Debian Buster IoT Image 2020-04-06 On Saturday, May 2, 2020 at 9:20:30 AM UTC-7, maxmike wrote: > > I get this: > > root@beaglebone:/# > /opt/source/bb.org-overlays/tools/beaglebone-universal-io/config-pin -q > P8.15 > P8_15 Mode: gpio Direct

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-02 Thread maxmike
I get this: root@beaglebone:/# /opt/source/bb.org-overlays/tools/beaglebone-universal-io/config-pin -q P8.15 P8_15 Mode: gpio Direction: pin_not_exported Value: pin_not_exported -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-01 Thread maxmike
> > I am using the version you had me install on Apr 23 (see above) . That one fixed everything except it created this. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-01 Thread maxmike
Yes, it is listed, just can't use it for output: config-pin -q 8.15 P8_15 Mode: gpio Direction: pin_not_exported Value: pin_not_exported root@beaglebone# config-pin -l 8.15 default gpio gpio_pu gpio_pd gpio_input qep pru_ecap pruin I thought of changing

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-01 Thread maxmike
/opt/scripts/tools/version.sh git:/opt/scripts/:[b39ec679648a6be8f25f48bd1c9784c1fc5a0c46] eeprom:[A335BNLTEIA03116BBBK06C2] model:[TI_AM335x_BeagleBone_Black] dogtag:[BeagleBoard.org Debian Buster IoT Image 2020-04-06] bootloader:[eMMC-(default)]:[/dev/mmcblk1]:[U-Boot

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-01 Thread maxmike
/opt/scripts/tools/version.sh git:/opt/scripts/:[b39ec679648a6be8f25f48bd1c9784c1fc5a0c46] eeprom:[A335BNLTEIA03116BBBK06C2] model:[TI_AM335x_BeagleBone_Black] dogtag:[BeagleBoard.org Debian Buster IoT Image 2020-04-06] bootloader:[eMMC-(default)]:[/dev/mmcblk1]:[U-Boot

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-05-01 Thread maxmike
> I may have one last issue: in comparing the old /boot/uEnv.txt > for uname_r=4.4.68-ti-r110 with the new one for uname_r=4.19.94-ti-r42 the semantics are now considerably different. I am trying to find a way to enable GPIO47 (p8.15) aka GPIO1_15 which should be free. Config-pin says

[beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-29 Thread maxmike
> Without much longer belabouring the point, in my case gcc did not check > my .h file; instead of checking it for syntax (a semicolon missing in a function definition) it accepted it and reported what the effect was of trusting it - totally incomprehensible errors. However, I have

[beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-28 Thread maxmike
Thank you Dennis. I don't know if this is the right place to make a comment or express an opinion, but be that as it may I have to say that gcc needs a far better error reporting mechanism. In java if the "compiler" encounters an unterminated expression at end of file, it flags it

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-28 Thread maxmike
> > I have serious problems with gcc 8.3.0: root@beaglebone:~/evseclient/compilec# gcc -o gcctest gcctest.c gcctest.c: In function ‘main’: gcctest.c:15:3: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘close’; did you mean ‘pclose’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] close(memh); ^

[beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-27 Thread maxmike
My profuse and sincere apologies to everybody - a rotten RJ45 came off the Internet router while I was working on the local subnet router. Mike -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard"

[beagleboard] Re: Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-27 Thread maxmike
root@beaglebone:/tmp# uname -a Linux beaglebone 4.19.94-ti-r42 #1buster SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 31 19:38:29 UTC 2020 armv7l GNU/Linux root@beaglebone:/tmp# apt-get update Err:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease Temporary failure resolving 'deb.debian.org' Err:2

Re: [beagleboard] Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-26 Thread maxmike
Is there any way to get aptitude to access gdb in Buster? apt-get update fails as does apt-get install gdb -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [beagleboard] Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-23 Thread maxmike
Using BeagleBoard.org Debian Buster IoT Image 2020-04-06 On Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 4:26:03 PM UTC-7, maxmike wrote: > > Wow - it looks like the entire cape-universal software is now broken: > > > One used to be able to do : config-pin p8.12 out > and then test it by issuin

Re: [beagleboard] Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-23 Thread maxmike
> > Wow - it looks like the entire cape-universal software is now broken: One used to be able to do : config-pin p8.12 out and then test it by issuing config-pin p8.12 hi or lo This is no longer possible, now the pin can only be set as pruout and hi/lo don't work anymore. -- For more

Re: [beagleboard] Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-23 Thread maxmike
> OK - but here we go again with cape-universal: root@beaglebone:~# config-pin -q p9.26 Current mode for P9_26 is: default root@beaglebone:~# config-pin p9.26 in+ ERROR: write() to /sys/devices/platform/ocp/ocp:P9_26_pinmux/state failed, No such device -- For more options, visit

Re: [beagleboard] Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-20 Thread maxmike
Rebooted and swapped routers (only one has the new network on it). I'm getting the feeling that Debian lost control here and needs connman. But I can't upgrade, so now I have to change horses in midstream because the old images can't support a netmask other than /24; not a problem if you are

[beagleboard] Network setup taken over by something

2020-04-20 Thread maxmike
I have been running BBB networking for some time using a netmask of 255.255.255.0; I now have to expand the network to 500 hosts, so I changed the mask to 255.255.254.0 to give a network at 192.168.0.0/23. I edited /etc/network/interfaces, but that seems to change nothing as per following;

[beagleboard] Re: temperature range for bbb rev.c

2018-11-20 Thread maxmike
You should be able to just connect a serial-to-usb debug cable to the six seerial pins and watch the boot process on the screen attached to the usb. On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 1:21:53 PM UTC-8, nik...@gmail.com wrote: > > Dear all > > i'd like to know if is possible to find some kind of

[beagleboard] Re: BBB industrial version

2018-11-20 Thread maxmike
In 2017 Arrow sold a processor based on the AM3358BZCZA100 which is industrial temperature, and we UL certified our product using that shipment - now the NRTL needs us to have that processor on there and lo-and-behold Arrow doesn't ship that anymore. We figured once you start delivering

Re: [beagleboard] reliability issues with Beaglebone Blacks, various failures

2018-03-15 Thread maxmike
> > I am in a similar situation - the red industrial boards undergo humidity >> tests for a week, then work for about 10 minutes before failing - according >> to the testers. > > I was wondering if in general it might be more reliable to run SD card images rather than using eMMC. We don't

Re: [beagleboard] Connman cannot be used in production of beaglebone wireless systems

2018-01-14 Thread maxmike
> > OK, I managed to remove connman and set up wlan0 the old way. It works > well even after reboots. However, now: if I create a flasher image using the tools/...//eMMC/beagleb* script and then reflash the unit with that image i get a constant reboot cycle - machine will not come back. I

Re: [beagleboard] Connman cannot be used in production of beaglebone wireless systems

2018-01-05 Thread maxmike
Can't remove connman as the service will stop and ssh is dead. There might be a way to do things after disabling connman service but I don't know what to do. On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 2:28:10 PM UTC-8, maxmike wrote: > > No - I'm trying to use wifi as wlan0; every load of a flash OS

Re: [beagleboard] Connman cannot be used in production of beaglebone wireless systems

2018-01-05 Thread maxmike
No - I'm trying to use wifi as wlan0; every load of a flash OS image fails to allow connects because the auto-generated connman service name on the new machine is different. The result is a different /var/lib/connman/* directory name. Fortunately at least wlan0 is constant or I could never do

[beagleboard] Connman cannot be used in production of beaglebone wireless systems

2018-01-05 Thread maxmike
In Jessie we have connman - and it causes severe problems if you try to build a number of identical embedded systems, connman will assign a new service name to each processor. So the settings directory has to be handcrafted separately for each. Even if you have a static ip which is the same in

[beagleboard] Re: BBB wireless won't reboot

2018-01-04 Thread maxmike
The file shows a line :* driver ecap already registered - aborting **what is that please?* On Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 5:40:29 PM UTC-8, maxmike wrote: > > The problem is here: > > wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 50:65:83:d1:aa:fa > UP BROADCAST MULTICAST DY

[beagleboard] Re: BBB wireless won't reboot

2018-01-04 Thread maxmike
The problem is here: wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 50:65:83:d1:aa:fa UP BROADCAST MULTICAST DYNAMIC MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0

[beagleboard] BBB wireless won't reboot

2018-01-04 Thread maxmike
I have a flasher image for a BBBW that loads just fine and works, but when I reboot, the network will no longer see the board. Comes back with "unreachable host". Can someone please point me at any particular file/setup I should look at? I'm really in a bind on this one. Serial log attached.

Re: [beagleboard] PWM Problems with BeagleBone Black Debian 8.4 Kernel 4.4

2017-12-25 Thread maxmike
/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie_main_binary-armhf_Packages.gz is not what the server reported 8864066 8864371 On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 3:09:56 PM UTC-8, maxmike wrote: > > I'm using cape-universal. > > On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 3:05:59 PM UTC-8, maxmike wrot

Re: [beagleboard] PWM Problems with BeagleBone Black Debian 8.4 Kernel 4.4

2017-12-25 Thread maxmike
I'm using cape-universal. On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 3:05:59 PM UTC-8, maxmike wrote: > > Nah, that doesn't work either AFAIK: > > I have kernel: *4.4.68-ti-r110 #1 SMP* > I enable pwm as:* bash -c 'echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/export'* > Then I set ttyO4 tx as:

Re: [beagleboard] PWM Problems with BeagleBone Black Debian 8.4 Kernel 4.4

2017-12-25 Thread maxmike
Nah, that doesn't work either AFAIK: I have kernel: *4.4.68-ti-r110 #1 SMP* I enable pwm as:* bash -c 'echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/export'* Then I set ttyO4 tx as: */usr/bin/config-pin P9_13 uart* and when the app runs it gives me a file not found bleat. Indeed the pwm files are not

Re: [beagleboard] Re: UART2 on Beaglebone Black Rev C - What changed from Debian 7 to Debian 8?

2017-12-24 Thread maxmike
Yes, Linux beaglebone 4.4.68-ti-r110 #1 SMP Wed Jun 21 04:31:35 UTC 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux has some unexpected problems with UART's We have a bunch of pcb's coming in and all of a sudden TTYO4 (hardwired) doesn't work. Cannot receive characters. Terminals were checked as active. Program worked

Re: [beagleboard] FCC Conducted Emissions Failure

2017-11-01 Thread maxmike
We need to do something similar and I'm trying to find a way to reduce the eth0 / wlan0 speed to 10 Mb, but it looks as though ethtool will not work in Debian on the Beaglebone Black. Is this a shortcoming of drivers or the hardware? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss

[beagleboard] Replace default iptables with ufw rules?

2017-10-27 Thread maxmike
I wanted to test removing all default iptable rules and replacing them with my own, using ufw. I have a very simple LAN that just needs 1/2 dozen ports, and iptable defaults are causing major conflicts when I try blocking IP's. So I created the ufw rule: *ufw allow 22/tcp* then I issued:

[beagleboard] Re: BBBW will not run boot script properly

2017-10-08 Thread maxmike
The boot script is among other things trying to use pin 8.13 for pwm. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[beagleboard] BBBW will not run boot script properly

2017-10-08 Thread maxmike
I have a working Linux beaglebone 4.4.68-ti-r110 #1 SMP Wed Jun 21 04:31:35 UTC 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux that does not use connman (uses /etc/network/interfaces) and successfully executes a boot script in init.d on a BBB. When I try the same on a BBBW where connman is the only boot option, the

[beagleboard] Re: Is it possible to flash bone80 onto Debian 8

2017-09-23 Thread maxmike
I cannot use the existing image because I have a need to allow users to dynamically change the ip address of a machine depending on installation parameters and this is really difficult to script with connman, unlike the old network manager. Replacing connman has not worked - some critical

[beagleboard] Is it possible to flash bone80 onto Debian 8

2017-09-23 Thread maxmike
Just got into infinite trouble - need to use industrial temp boards for production and I thought I could flash the bone80 production image onto these machines, but no joy. They use Linux beaglebone 4.4.68-ti-r110 #1 SMP Wed Jun 21 04:31:35 UTC 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux and the flashing process

[beagleboard] Cape-universal will not load

2017-09-19 Thread maxmike
I have to revert to bone84 to get these boards out to production and just found a problem with cape-universal. I'd like to know how to install it at boot time. *uEnv.txt:* #Docs: http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:U-boot_partitioning_layout_2.0 uname_r=3.8.13-bone84 #uuid= #dtb=

[beagleboard] Re: Can't connect to BBB Wireless with ssh anymore

2017-08-04 Thread maxmike
If you have another wired network connection when you boot the BBBW then the wlan0 may not come up. Better to boot with just wifi, then plug in cable. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[beagleboard] Connmanctl does not allow service name to be used

2017-08-04 Thread maxmike
If you want to deliver a product based on the BBBW the user (who is probably busy or not technical) has to unpack the service as a hash cipher using connmanctl, then they can set up a static IP. They can't just use the service name. The result is that if you want to shield them from connman

[beagleboard] Why is the pwm setting volatile on Debian 4.4.68-ti-r111 ?

2017-07-18 Thread maxmike
I have cape-universal set up: 0: PF -1 1: PF -1 2: PF -1 3: PF -1 4: P-O-L- 0 Override Board Name,00A0,Override Manuf,univ-emmc root@beaglebone:~# config-pin -q p8.13 P8_13 Mode: pwm So I configure pwm for pwmchip4 : sh -c "echo 0 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/export"

[beagleboard] How to set WIFI in Debian?

2017-07-01 Thread maxmike
Thereis also the issue I have, where I allow unsophisticated users to dynamically change the static IP address. With ifconfig I can give them a script, but connmanctl doesn't make that as simple. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because

Re: [beagleboard] Re: SD Card Image for BBBW

2017-06-12 Thread maxmike
:46 AM, maxmike <maxmi...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > Thanks - I got the BBBW to run but why is it such a bear to get a root > login > > on Debian. > > I can access the machine with a "debian" login, then I used su to login > as > > root, which

Re: [beagleboard] Re: SD Card Image for BBBW

2017-06-12 Thread maxmike
Thanks - I got the BBBW to run but why is it such a bear to get a root login on Debian. I can access the machine with a "debian" login, then I used su to login as root, which works, but then, when I try to login as user root with the same password I get "access denied." -- For more options,

[beagleboard] Re: SD Card Image for BBBW

2017-06-09 Thread maxmike
Is it possible to get a stable RCN image for the BBBW that is headless? I'd like to avoid the burden of graphics. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [beagleboard] Re: BeagleBone Black Industrial 4G compliant BBB logo?

2017-03-23 Thread maxmike
Thank you Alexander - how do you load them? I just do a dd from my backup image on the USB stick onto /dev/mmcblk1, running from a bone40 sd. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard"

Re: [beagleboard] Re: BeagleBone Black Industrial 4G compliant BBB logo?

2017-03-23 Thread maxmike
So we can't move a 2G quasi-production image from std BBB to the industrial 4G BBB? I have to build a whole new image? And - "probably" work fine? Not exactly a smooth upgrade path. How do I even go from Debian 3.8.13-bone50 to whatever 3/19 is without having to do a selective backup. Is that an

Re: [beagleboard] Re: BeagleBone Black Industrial 4G compliant BBB logo?

2017-03-22 Thread maxmike
Since Robert isn't saying I assume he's talking to the factory - I'll ship them back. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [beagleboard] Re: BeagleBone Black Industrial 4G compliant BBB logo?

2017-03-20 Thread maxmike
A serial log? Haven't done that in years - need to find/dust off the hardware cables for that. Will try - thanks. On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:55:25 AM UTC-7, RobertCNelson wrote: > > Can you share your serial boot log? > > My guess, it's the newer eMMC used on the board.. > > around

[beagleboard] Re: BeagleBone Black Industrial 4G compliant BBB logo?

2017-03-20 Thread maxmike
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 5:02:16 AM UTC-8, kgkyt...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, ALL > > I found some BeagleBoard. > > That is BeagleBone Black Industrial 4G provided by elemnt14 as below: > > > > -element14 BeagleBone Black Industrial 4G > > >

Re: [beagleboard] Re: operating temperature range of Beaglebone Black

2017-03-20 Thread maxmike
I have now ordered extended temp. BBB's from two different sources and both failed to work. We use them by first loading Debian 3.8.13-bone50 via the USB stick. In one case it failed to boot (just power light on), in the other it sometimes power boots, sometimes not and even if it boots, it

Re: [beagleboard] How to change default hwclock on BBB Debian to always be /dev/rtc1?

2016-10-09 Thread maxmike
I don~t think Robert recompiled the kernel. I am using 3.8.13 Debian. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [beagleboard] How to change default hwclock on BBB Debian to always be /dev/rtc1?

2016-10-09 Thread maxmike
Robert, when using rtc0, did you also use .../i2c-adapter/i2c-0... ? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [beagleboard] Same wire going to adc and comparator kills interrupts

2015-01-20 Thread maxmike
O Well, the datasheet shows VO has a worse case voltage range from 250mv to VCC-0.35v. Is this consistent with your measurements? Yes - actually I'm seeing 3.3V to 0. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[beagleboard] Re: Same wire going to adc and comparator kills interrupts

2015-01-20 Thread maxmike
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 5:45:03 AM UTC-8, mickeyf wrote: Being a software guy I tend to be quick to use a sledgehammer, but if push came to shove would a buffer before the comparator screw things up? Yeah, it's that or parallel the entire path from signal source. I have to say,

[beagleboard] Re: Same wire going to adc and comparator kills interrupts

2015-01-20 Thread maxmike
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 8:01:40 AM UTC-8, TJF wrote: Hi software guy, why don't you drop the hardware and use the sampled ADC value to trigger the interrupt? The interrupt has to occur waaay before the adc has a chance to measure the value that caused it. I.e. it has to be

[beagleboard] Same wire going to adc and comparator kills interrupts

2015-01-19 Thread maxmike
I have the output of an op amp go directly to the BBB adc and the values are read correctly. But, the same wire is going to a comparator to generate interrupts. It looks like the comparator is not firing all the way to ground because of the adc drag. I thought of placing a 1K resistor from the

[beagleboard] BBB SYS_5V not dead on power off

2015-01-02 Thread maxmike
I am powering a DC/DC converter on my cape with SYS_5V and just noticed that on toggling the power button the machine does turn off, but there's still about 2V on SYS_5V - why? Using a 2A regulated power supply to power the unit. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss ---

Re: [beagleboard] BBB Rev C: Debian: PureJavaComm/JNA test fails

2014-09-07 Thread maxmike
Can't figure out why people trash Java (my language is better than yours thing;) the key driver of Java is its library - it has no peer! On Thursday, July 31, 2014 9:15:04 AM UTC-7, William Hermans wrote: Datenheld, My point was why use a language, when if key feature is taken away . . .

[beagleboard] Re: Security when connecting autonomous BB to the Internet

2014-08-25 Thread maxmike
Trying to make an embedded BBB into a product requires securing it. If it enjoys physical security there are some standard procedures you can use and quite a bit of material on the Web. However, there are 3 entry points to a physically exposed machine: the USB client port, the SD port and the

[beagleboard] Re: Security when connecting autonomous BB to the Internet

2014-08-25 Thread maxmike
Forgot to add the ISP header; that may be tied to a tty port that can be disabled. Still working on that. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Security when connecting autonomous BB to the Internet

2014-08-25 Thread maxmike
be hijacked at boot time. In order to secure these two devices, I think you'd have to do so from within uboot. On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, John Syn john...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: From: maxmike maxmi...@gmail.com javascript: Reply-To: beagl...@googlegroups.com javascript

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Security when connecting autonomous BB to the Internet

2014-08-25 Thread maxmike
OK - but where do we go from here? uEnv.txt is out, device tree is out and everybody has to hack their own uboot to enable boot security? I mean, when considering embedded Unix surely somebody that knows more about this than your average app-oriented developer could provide a modifiable boot

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Security when connecting autonomous BB to the Internet

2014-08-25 Thread maxmike
Aaah - thanks: a rational answer to an irrational question. On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:57:32 PM UTC-7, RobertCNelson wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:53 PM, maxmike maxmi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: OK - but where do we go from here? uEnv.txt is out, device tree is out

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Security when connecting autonomous BB to the Internet

2014-08-25 Thread maxmike
Thanks to everybody that pitched in here - I see the error of my ways; after looking at the TI boot pages I see we are indeed at the mercy of TI's boot rom. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [beagleboard] Using GPIO

2014-07-31 Thread maxmike
I'm setting up cape-universal on a production machine - minor item, but I noticed the syntax *in+* works whereas the equivalent *in_pu* does not. On Saturday, May 3, 2014 3:01:51 PM UTC-7, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: You beat me to the answer...use the config-pin utility! :) Let me know if

Re: [beagleboard] Can't make pwm work on cape-universal

2014-06-12 Thread maxmike
, maxmike wrote: No need to modify cape-universal. Since I'm on the clock what I'll do is remove the pwm pins I need from cape-universal .dts and recompile; then load the perfectly good, existing /lib/firmware entries for pwm. That will work, of course, but the whole reason

Re: [beagleboard] Can't make pwm work on cape-universal

2014-06-12 Thread maxmike
. On 6/12/2014 2:12 PM, maxmike wrote: Thank you - unfortunately the boot order of the pwm indexes as applied to pins is random (i.e. pin P8_13 is 6 one day and something else another.) On Thursday, June 5, 2014 1:23:50 PM UTC-7, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: On 6/5/2014 12:11 PM

[beagleboard] Re: Cape Device Tree Overlay fails to load during boot?

2014-06-10 Thread maxmike
Yes - same problem here; I just added the echo $SLOTS script to /etc/profile to walk around all this. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [beagleboard] Can't make pwm work on cape-universal

2014-06-05 Thread maxmike
No need to modify cape-universal. Since I'm on the clock what I'll do is remove the pwm pins I need from cape-universal .dts and recompile; then load the perfectly good, existing /lib/firmware entries for pwm. I assume the published cape-universal .dts is in fact valid:

Re: [beagleboard] Can't make pwm work on cape-universal

2014-06-05 Thread maxmike
On Thursday, June 5, 2014 10:12:01 AM UTC-7, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: On 6/5/2014 11:52 AM, maxmike wrote: No need to modify cape-universal. Since I'm on the clock what I'll do is remove the pwm pins I need from cape-universal .dts and recompile; then load the perfectly good

Re: [beagleboard] Using GPIO

2014-06-03 Thread maxmike
Jason, could you please let me know how you got cape-universal to let you do pwm? If I use the am33xx_pwm and bone_pwm_P9_21 dtbo's I can see /sys/devices/ocp.3/pwm_test_ P9_21.11 period polarity and run files. If I use the cape-universal instead and config-pin P9_21 as pwm all I get is a

[beagleboard] Can't make pwm work on cape-universal

2014-06-03 Thread maxmike
I loaded this on Debian 3.8.13 and I can use it for gpio, but when I change P8_13 to use pwm there are no duty or period or polarity files anywhere. Even after a reboot. Could somebody please give me a hint. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this

[beagleboard] Re: [PATCH] BeagleBone Universal Device Tree Overlay

2014-06-02 Thread maxmike
finding the period, polarity, run files. On Sunday, June 1, 2014 1:12:22 PM UTC-7, maxmike wrote: Charles, all seems to be as advertise with the cape-universal, but it would be useful to get a hint of where things like period and frequency files live for pwm so they can be changed within