[beagleboard] Graphics emulation and building SGX drivers with Android

Hi, I am struggling to get graphics working with Android. I do not have SGX drivers and want to rely on software emulation and rendering. Does this work with Android? I get the following errors during boot up: --

[beagleboard] Re: SDIO interface on Beagle bone black

On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 6:01:29 PM UTC+5:30, annapurna bommakanti wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I am able to interface a SDIO module to the mmc3 by modifying the DTS file. > I am able to detect as SDIO on mmc3. But the CM53 fails while trying to > load firmware on to the module. > > info

[beagleboard] Mainline Linux and Android Kernel porting.

Hi, I have successfully patched Android 4.14 with mainline kernel 4.14. I have booted the kernel by merging omap2plus_defconfig, android-base.config and android-recommended-config config files and using the Debian rootfs. I see binder, ashmem in /dev. Is this enough to start porting full Androi

[beagleboard] Beaglebone black and Brillo

Hi, Has anybody tried porting Brillo to BBB? BBB seems ideal for IoT and Brillo is a nice fit for it. I am starting with exploring Brillo and thinking of doing a minimal porting to the BBB. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Gautam. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/disc

Re: [beagleboard] Merge conflict when I do a git pull on origin/V4.4

On Monday, January 15, 2018 at 12:23:55 AM UTC+5:30, David Lechner wrote: > > Each new release is rebased, not merged, so you need to also rebase your > work instead of pulling (merging). > > I am kind of confused. My current branch is 4.4 I did the following: git checkout master git fetch git

[beagleboard] Merge conflict when I do a git pull on origin/V4.4

Hi, Hope somebody can clear my confusion. I have pulled the kernel from https://github.com/beagleboard/linux. I am in origin/v4.4. I have compiled and built and have successfully run the kernel. After this I do a distclean and clean my working directory. git status shows: On branch 4.4 Your

[beagleboard] Debian Rootfs necessary packages.

Hi, I have created a Debian Rootfs with the necessary packages and was able to boot up the Beagle. I have a problem where the network does not come up automatically and my DNS does not seem to resolve properly as the addresses does not get resolved properly. What are the customizations and pac

Re: [beagleboard] Linux Kernel tree for porting to mailine and basic support.

On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 1:36:56 AM UTC+5:30, Drew Fustini wrote: > > If you are curious about the patches applied on top of mainline, then > check out this directory from Robert's ti-linux-kernel-dev repo: > > > https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/tree/ti-linux-4.14.y

[beagleboard] Re: fsck fails to start on writable partition at boot/startup

On Saturday, December 9, 2017 at 1:47:29 AM UTC+5:30, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > > > Prior to a lay-off, my last four years were avionics -- > fortunately > mostly maintenance work for existing software (since my prior 30 years > experience qualified as "mainframe number crunching", s

[beagleboard] Re: fsck fails to start on writable partition at boot/startup

On Friday, December 8, 2017 at 9:05:02 PM UTC+5:30, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 19:17:09 -0800 (PST), > minde...@gmail.com declaimed the > following: > > > I too have a similar problem but not have worked directly on the > problem. > >This is in medical devices where the

[beagleboard] Re: fsck fails to start on writable partition at boot/startup

Hi Dave, I too have a similar problem but not have worked directly on the problem. This is in medical devices where the instruments power is pulled off abruptly without shutting down. Also the wear and tear of the eMMC and detection of errors etc. The problems become much more serious and I ca

[beagleboard] Re: fsck fails to start on writable partition at boot/startup

Hi Dave, As you said not unusual but I am not sure. As in the earlier post it is better not to have fsck ask for confirmation. I feel there is some problem in the scripts which might have failed and not in the fsck. What is the filesystem type here? A battery backup maybe in the form of a supe

[beagleboard] Re: fsck fails to start on writable partition at boot/startup

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:44:27 AM UTC+5:30, Dave Barndt wrote: > > Hi Gautam, > > Thanks for the reply! I actually had the same idea last night, and did > manage to boot the board using an image on an SD card, and was able to run > the fsck from there against the bad partition on th

[beagleboard] Re: fsck fails to start on writable partition at boot/startup

On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 3:00:32 AM UTC+5:30, Dave Barndt wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm hoping that someone has come across this problem before and can point > me in the right direction. > > I'm trying to troubleshoot a BeagleBone Black with Debian 8 that appears > to have a filesystem corrupti

[beagleboard] Re: kernel boot failed after adding u-boot splash screen

Hi Laksono, Can you try powering it with the power adapter rather than the USB? Also without the LCD or attaching to an external monitor does the boot up work? Thanks, Gautam. On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 8:04:13 AM UTC+5:30, laksono budi wrote: > > >

Re: [beagleboard] Linux Kernel tree for porting to mailine and basic support.

On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:26:13 AM UTC+5:30, RobertCNelson wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Graham > wrote: > > The notes on GitHub say to only use VM VirtualBox 5.1.x and to not use > > 5.2.x. > > > > Is that because 5.2 was too new and unstable at the time? Or is ther

[beagleboard] Re: Linux Kernel tree for porting to mailine and basic support.

On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 1:09:37 AM UTC+5:30, din...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, > > I think https://github.com/beagleboard/linux would be the best reference > tree. > > Which subsystem are you going to mainline? > > Regards, > Dimitar > Hi Dimitar, I have not decided on anything to m

[beagleboard] Linux Kernel tree for porting to mailine and basic support.

Hi, What is the Linux kernel tree which is used to provide mainline support for the beaglebone black? I would like to contribute towards mainlining and I would like to know which is the tree for which the beaglebone black development happens. I am assuming the tree is https://github.com/beagl