On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Timothy Comments
timothyfauc...@gmail.com wrote:
[ suggestions that people associated with BBB are not helpful and engage in
backroom deals]
You make extraordinary claims, so you are expected to back them with
extraordinary evidence. Please retract if you
Dennis, and Timothy,
Out of curiosity, what does all of this conversation get the two of you ?
Does it get you what you want, despite you being told that if you want
something a certain way you're going to have to have it made yourself ?
From the outside looking in, this seems like a children
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 4:29:58 PM UTC-6, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Well, I'm not Gerald, but I'll be surprised if anything is changing on
the PCB. The change to a 4G eMMC requires no changes to the PCB and are
being made to improve margin, so don't expect to see any new parts.
I have no plans to make any changes to the board. Only change for Rev C was
to populate the 4G eMMC. The idea of scrapping 80,000 is definitely a cost
issue.
The requirement for the BBB was to be compatible with the BeagleBone.
Gerald
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Charles Steinkuehler
No. If they were connected, they could be used. They do not require the PRU
to drive them.
Gerald
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Dennis Cote denn...@harding.ca wrote:
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 8:25:39 AM UTC-6, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Yes, those are PRU peripherals. The PRU has a
On 5/1/2014 12:59 PM, Dennis Cote wrote:
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 9:44:35 AM UTC-6, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
UART0 and PR1_UART0 are totally different chunks of hardware. Do not
get confused by the fact that they both have UART0 in the name, they
are *NOT* the same.
I understand
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:08:02 PM UTC-6, Gerald wrote:
I see. One of those commercial guys. I thought so.
You say that like it is a negative thing. I can almost hear the sigh
afterwards.
I don't understand your resentment of commercial users.
You have done a masterful job designing a
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Dennis Cote denn...@harding.ca wrote:
Also, we are expecting to buy about 1K boards per year rather than a couple
of boards. We will be buying directly from CircuitCo, but we would like them
to be the same boards they build for distribution if at all possible.
There is no resentment. We just don't support commercial users of
the boards with the BeagleBoard LOGO on it as we have stated.
http://www.elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack#Terms_of_Use
Everything is there for you to build it yourself. Go for it. No strings
attached.
Gerald
On Thu, May
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 2:14:21 PM UTC-6, Gerald wrote:
There is no resentment. We just don't support commercial users of
the boards with the BeagleBoard LOGO on it as we have stated.
I don't know if the boards I would buy from CircuitCo will have the
BeagleBoard logo or not. I assume
Not quite everything is there. The key missing piece is the production
volume which is the one of the principal determining factors in the cost.
You, and others, are being disingenuous when you say go build your own.
You know that will not be economically viable for most users, commercial or
If you get boards from anyone without the logo, they are in fact at that
point your board. So you can do whatever you like. Make whatever changes
you want. And, you can build the board as long as you want.
Once we change a board, we no longer make the old revision. If I start
making changes for
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 2:53:36 PM UTC-6, Gerald wrote:
If you get boards from anyone without the logo, they are in fact at that
point your board. So you can do whatever you like. Make whatever changes
you want. And, you can build the board as long as you want.
I am aware of the many
You are not alone, we also are finding the people at beaglebone
(beagleboard?) or shall we say Texas Instruments uncooperative, surly,
uncaring and unsupporting to other professional people who want to join
their team and use their own money to get behind their processor products
with third
Hi,
This question is meant for Gerald Coley since he is the only one who can
answer it.
Gerald, is there any reason (aside from cost) that you didn't connect the
UART0 RTS and CTS lines (balls E17 and E18) to the J1 header for the serial
console?
In my project I need all the LCD lines which
On 4/30/2014 5:17 PM, Dennis Cote wrote:
Hi,
This question is meant for Gerald Coley since he is the only one who can
answer it.
Gerald, is there any reason (aside from cost) that you didn't connect the
UART0 RTS and CTS lines (balls E17 and E18) to the J1 header for the serial
16 matches
Mail list logo
