Re: regex for matching Google URLs

2011-01-17 Thread John W. Krahn
Alexey Mishustin wrote: 1/18/2011, "Grant" вы писали: I came up with these but they don't seem to work reliably: /\.google\..*\/imgres\?/ /\.google\..*\/images\?/ /\.google\..*\/products\?/ /(www.){0,1}(google\.).*\/(imgres)|(images)|(products)\?{0,1}/ That says: (www.){0,1} Match a fo

Re: regex for matching Google URLs

2011-01-17 Thread Alexey Mishustin
1/18/2011, "Uri Guttman" вы писали: >> "AM" == Alexey Mishustin writes: > > AM> /(www.){0,1}(google\.).*\/(imgres)|(images)|(products)\?{0,1}/ > >{0,1} is just ? by itself. Yes, I know. But I like the {a,b} syntax more :) It's more uniform than ?,+,* etc. >you don't need to grab things t

Re: regex for matching Google URLs

2011-01-17 Thread Uri Guttman
> "AM" == Alexey Mishustin writes: AM> /(www.){0,1}(google\.).*\/(imgres)|(images)|(products)\?{0,1}/ {0,1} is just ? by itself. you don't need to grab things that are not used later on. also why grab each trailing word separately which means it will be hard to tell what word was there.

Re: regex for matching Google URLs

2011-01-17 Thread Alexey Mishustin
1/18/2011, "Alexey Mishustin" вы писали: > >1/18/2011, "Grant" вы писали: > >>> I'm trying to come up with a regex that will match any Google Images >>> URL such as these: >>> >>> www.google.com/imgres >>> www.google.com/images >>> google.com/imgres >>> www.google.co.uk/imgres >>> www.google.nl

Re: regex for matching Google URLs

2011-01-17 Thread Alexey Mishustin
1/18/2011, "Grant" вы писали: >> I'm trying to come up with a regex that will match any Google Images >> URL such as these: >> >> www.google.com/imgres >> www.google.com/images >> google.com/imgres >> www.google.co.uk/imgres >> www.google.nl/imgres >> >> and a second regex for Google Products UR

Re: regex for matching Google URLs

2011-01-17 Thread Grant
> I'm trying to come up with a regex that will match any Google Images > URL such as these: > > www.google.com/imgres > www.google.com/images > google.com/imgres > www.google.co.uk/imgres > www.google.nl/imgres > > and a second regex for Google Products URLs of which this is one example: > > www.go

Perl Mail::Sendmail encoding problem

2011-01-17 Thread sync
Greetings all, I have to send emails through a smtp server, with Chinese character encoding. In details , the encoding of my send mail is UTF-8, but the encoding of others received is GB2321 , so it will apprears with "weird" characters. Does anyone has any working example or any suggestio

regex for matching Google URLs

2011-01-17 Thread Grant
I'm trying to come up with a regex that will match any Google Images URL such as these: www.google.com/imgres www.google.com/images google.com/imgres www.google.co.uk/imgres www.google.nl/imgres and a second regex for Google Products URLs of which this is one example: www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou

Re: how to trap print() errors?

2011-01-17 Thread David Christensen
Ron Bergin wrote: It's interesting that you found the warning message to be meaningless, but the exact same message was helpful when you told the pragma to raise the level of warnings to be fatal. I should have said nearly the same message. Both messages told you where the problem was located

Re: how to trap print() errors?

2011-01-17 Thread David Christensen
Shawn H Corey wrote: Have you looked at `perldoc autodie` yet? I don't know if it'll die on warnings though. Yes, thank you. autodie doesn't seem to be a base package (on my platform), so I continued searching and found: use warnings FATAL => 'all'; which is a better solution for what

Re: how to trap print() errors?

2011-01-17 Thread Shawn H Corey
Have you looked at `perldoc autodie` yet? I don't know if it'll die on warnings though. -- Just my 0.0002 million dollars worth, Shawn Confusion is the first step of understanding. Programming is as much about organization and communication as it is about coding. The secret to great

Re: New Document: "How to Start Contributing to or Using Open Source Software"

2011-01-17 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:28:06PM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote: > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > >On Monday 27 Dec 2010 21:44:05 Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >> I think it is not fair to pointing the reader out directly to Linux. > >>There are other systems