AW: DESTROY executed twice

2006-06-16 Thread Glaessl, Danilo
Thank you, that's it! Removing the exit call from DESTROY solves the problem. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tom Phoenix Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 18:15 An: Glaessl, Danilo Cc: beginners@perl.org Betreff: Re: DESTROY

AW: DESTROY executed twice

2006-06-14 Thread Glaessl, Danilo
To my mind, the following militates against your theory: The parent only forks the child processes and terminates afterwards, it does not create objects. Objects are created by its child processes only. So I expect the objects to be destroyed only when the child processes terminate. In

Re: AW: DESTROY executed twice

2006-06-14 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
By the way, your AW is incorrect. The internet standard is Re:, in spite of Microsoft's intentions to mangle the net by localizing a convention that needs no localization. (It's a latin word, not an English abbreviation.) Glaessl == Glaessl, Danilo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Glaessl To my