Rob Dixon wrote:
> The old 'wrap or rewrite' problem.
>
> MO is to rewrite. Always. unless you have an 'infinite number of
> monkeys' or your source is massive. Most will disagree.
The fact is, i don't want to change what my script does: i want to use it
to do something more. So i don't think i
Rob Dixon wrote:
> Your question is too long.
I will surely follow your direction, though my message was verbose
because, as i stated in the first line, it was not a technical problem
but more of a coding-philosphical one.
I think code is little relevant in this case, but i'll post it at the
b
Jenda wrote:
>
> From: zanardi2k3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > That poses the problem of executing my script for several folders,
> > with different parameters for each of them. Now i'm wondering if i
> > have to include the possibility of multiple "backups" in the script
> > itself, if i better write a
From: zanardi2k3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That poses the problem of executing my script for several folders,
> with different parameters for each of them. Now i'm wondering if i
> have to include the possibility of multiple "backups" in the script
> itself, if i better write another script that calls
Zanardi2k3 wrote:
>
> Hello, not a technical problem, i'm just looking for opinions.
>
> Using "Archive::Zip", i made a script with the main purpose of making a
> quick backup of a folder and all its subfolders in a zip file.
>
> The script can take a few parameters:
> - the main folder backup (man
Hello, not a technical problem, i'm just looking for opinions.
Using "Archive::Zip", i made a script with the main purpose of making a
quick backup of a folder and all its subfolders in a zip file.
The script can take a few parameters:
- the main folder backup (mandatory);
- the full path of the
