On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Todd Wade wrote:
>
> "R. Joseph Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Todd Wade wrote:
> >
> > > I'm willing to pester the site owners to let you do the site. But it
> will
> > > probably take more than just you and I. The lack of responses t
"R. Joseph Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Todd Wade wrote:
>
> > I'm willing to pester the site owners to let you do the site. But it
will
> > probably take more than just you and I. The lack of responses to your OP
> > might indicate the amount of help the r
Todd Wade wrote:
> I'm willing to pester the site owners to let you do the site. But it will
> probably take more than just you and I. The lack of responses to your OP
> might indicate the amount of help the rest of the group is willing to
> contribute.
I think you may be misinterpreting the sile
"Shlomi Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi all!
>
> I believe learn.perl.org is very lacking:
>
> 1. Its design is ugly.
>
agreed
>
> 2. No links to many important online resources such as tutorials, books,
> article collections, mailing lists, web forums, e
Hi all!
I believe learn.perl.org is very lacking:
1. Its design is ugly.
2. No links to many important online resources such as tutorials, books,
article collections, mailing lists, web forums, etc.
3. Concentration on commercial books.
4. No source code for the site is available and [EMAIL P
