In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul D. Kraus wrote:
> Ok this could work but then I would need to know before hand what words
> are important and which ones arent. We carry over 40 thousand products
> having to do with orthotics, prosthetics, ect. Unless I misunderstood
> you. Thanks agian!
Thi
Kevin Old wrote:
>
> Also, for example purposes, say the item you want to match on is a
> "Black Kettle" and your description is "Black Kettle", but their
> description is "BLK KTTL". Would there be occurrences like this?
>
Damn. You mean I could have bought my prosthetic black kettle
more cheapl
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 09:04, Paul D. Kraus wrote:
> Ok here is the scenioro I have two price lists that contain itemcode
> description cost list The important two are itemcode and description.
> One is our list the other is the price list of our major competitior. Of
> course they use differ
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Kraus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Description Search
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:24:09 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems my University project.
>
> Some
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:24:09 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This seems my University project.
Some years ago I did something more or less similar.
Insted of removing some words, I would just rate witch word. For instance
count each word in your description and give a coeficient to it like 1 /
This seems my University project.
Some years ago I did something more or less similar.
Insted of removing some words, I would just rate witch word. For instance
count each word in your description and give a coeficient to it like 1 /
(count * count). After for similarities you can consider to sum
