R. Joseph Newton wrote:
Eamon Daly wrote:
Hi, all. I'm using Imager to create gifs, but the resultant
file sizes are /huge/. I'm writing the files out like so:
Are you doing animations? If not, skip the GIFs. You can get much
better depth [16 million] in a lot less space with JPEG files.
Kevin Goodsell wrote:
Third, only in relatively bad cases will GIF require a byte for every
pixel. For example, I just created a solid white 200 by 200 image.
That's 40,000 pixels. The file size is 345 bytes. One byte per pixel is
what you would get if no compression was used at all (probably
Kevin Goodsell wrote:
Third, only in relatively bad cases will GIF require a byte for every
pixel. For example, I just created a solid white 200 by 200 image.
That's 40,000 pixels. The file size is 345 bytes. One byte per pixel is
what you would get if no compression was used at all (probably
Eamon Daly wrote:
Hi, all. I'm using Imager to create gifs, but the resultant
file sizes are /huge/. I'm writing the files out like so:
Are you doing animations? If not, skip the GIFs. You can get much
better depth [16 million] in a lot less space with JPEG files.
Some of the compression
Hi, all. I'm using Imager to create gifs, but the resultant
file sizes are /huge/. I'm writing the files out like so:
$img-write(type = 'gif',
max_colors = 16,
gif_eliminate_unused = 1,
data = \$data) or die $img-errstr;
I've verified that the
